https://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/cerj/issue/feedContemporary Educational Researches Journal2025-04-29T15:24:28+03:00Assoc. Prof. Dr. Deniz Ozcancerj.editor@gmail.comOpen Journal Systems<p><strong>Contemporary Educational Researches Journal (CERJ)</strong> is an international peer-refereed journal that promotes the researches in the field of contemporary and innovative education practices and research involving educational administration, assessments and evaluations, guidance and counseling in schools, educational technology, curriculum, learning environments, social and psychological issues of education, subject areas of teaching and learning, special education and teaching and learning approaches and theories.</p> <p><strong>Basic Rules</strong></p> <p>1) The Contac author must be one of the <strong>article authors</strong>. Other than the authors, no one else can submit the article. <strong>It is immediately rejected</strong>.</p> <p>2) Make sure that issues about publication ethics, copyright, authorship, figure formats, data, and references format have been appropriately considered.</p> <p>3) Ensure that all authors have approved the content of the submitted manuscript. Once a manuscript has been submitted, no author changes, additions or reductions can be made. In that case, the manuscript will be <strong>rejected at any stage</strong>.</p> <p>4) An author can publish a maximum of two articles per year.</p> <p>5) Manuscripts submitted to CERJ Journal should neither been published before nor be under consideration for publication in another journal or conference.</p> <p>6) An article can have a maximum of six (6) authors.</p> <p align="justify">No article submission, processing or publication charge is required. All accepted manuscripts will be published free of cost.</p> <p align="justify"><em>The journal is under the review of Scopus and Web of Science. If the journal is accepted to be indexed, your article will also be included in these indexes.</em></p>https://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/cerj/article/view/9446Exploring language learning styles and academic achievement among Iranian senior high school EFL students2025-01-30T07:43:24+03:00Seyyed Abbas Sajjadiabbassajjadi3@gmail.comPardis Elahipelahi7798@gmail.com<p>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between language learning styles and academic achievement among Iranian senior high school EFL students. The study addressed a gap in the literature regarding the impact of learning styles on EFL students' performance in Iran, as few studies have explored this connection in this specific educational context. The target sample consisted of 40 randomly selected 11th-grade students from two public schools in Kazerun, Fars province, Iran. The VARK Learning Style Index was used to identify the students' preferred learning styles, and their final exam achievement test scores were used to measure academic performance. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the data. The results revealed that the majority of students were auditory learners, followed by kinesthetic and reading/writing learners, with visual learners making up the smallest group. Notably, auditory learners achieved the highest mean test scores, indicating a potential link between auditory learning preferences and academic success. These findings suggest that recognizing and adapting to individual learning styles, particularly auditory preferences, can enhance student engagement and academic achievement. The study provides valuable insights for educators aiming to optimize language instruction based on students' learning style profiles.</p> <p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong>: Academic achievement; EFL learner; learning style.</p>2025-02-28T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Contemporary Educational Researches Journalhttps://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/cerj/article/view/9627Training needs of physical education teachers in Jordan and their relationship to various variables2025-03-09T02:30:04+03:00Randa Saleh Jawarnehmrsranda1976@bau.edu.joMohammad Omar AL-Momanim.o.e.m@bau.edu.joAmjed Mohammad Alabd AlazeezDeebemad86@yahoo.comEmadeddln Mohammad TheiyabatDeebemad86@yahoo.comSaa Saleh ObeidatSaa.saleh@bau.edu.joLubna Mahmoud ObeidatLubna.222@bau.edu.joElham Mahmoud Rababam.o.e.m@bau.edu.jo<p>This study aimed to identify the training needs of physical education teachers in Jordan and explore their relationship with variables such as academic qualification and experience. A descriptive approach was used, with a questionnaire as the data collection tool, administered to a sample of 285 male and female teachers during the second semester of the 2021-2022 academic year. The results, after conducting the necessary statistical analysis, revealed that physical education teachers in Jordan expressed a need for training in all the skills examined in the study, including teaching planning, classroom management, classroom environment, assessment tool development, and strategy implementation. Furthermore, the study found no statistically significant differences in training needs based on the variables of gender, academic qualification, or experience. These findings suggest that regardless of these factors, there is a consistent demand for professional development in physical education teaching practices in Jordan.</p> <p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong> Needs; training; training needs; physical education; teachers.</p>2025-02-28T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Contemporary Educational Researches Journalhttps://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/cerj/article/view/9628Effectiveness of microlearning model on the learning outcomes of elementary school students2025-03-09T03:03:39+03:00Aman Simaremaretuansimare@unimed.ac.idYasaratodo Wauyasarotodo@gmail.comTrisnawati Hutagalungrisnawatihutagalung@unimed.ac.idHusna Parluhutan Hutagalunghusnaparluhutan@unimed.ac.idDwi Annissaefendisjsianturi@yahoo.comCepti Yuria Pratamarinadoriana@gmail.com<p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Microlearning model on student learning outcomes. The study involved students from class VC (n = 24) and class VB (n = 23). A randomized posttest-only control group design experimental approach was used, with data collected through multiple-choice tests created by the class teacher. The research data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, specifically the student t-test with a significance level of 0.05. The findings revealed a significant difference in learning outcomes between the class using the microlearning model and the class employing a conventional model. These results suggest that the microlearning model significantly enhances student learning outcomes, demonstrating its effectiveness as a teaching strategy. The study highlights the potential of microlearning in improving educational practices and provides valuable insights for educators seeking to optimize student engagement and achievement.</p> <p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong> Elementary school; learning outcomes; microlearning model; students</p>2025-02-28T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Contemporary Educational Researches Journalhttps://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/cerj/article/view/9629Augmented reality in Physics education: A tool for intellectual learning2025-03-09T12:53:27+03:00B.S. Arymbekovbeckemn@mail.ruК.М. Тurekhanovabeckemn@gmail.com<p>This study investigated the integration of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies in physics education, focusing on their potential to enhance teaching methods and address existing pedagogical challenges. A literature review, along with an experimental comparison of AR and VR-based instruction, was conducted to assess their impact on student engagement, comprehension, and retention. The findings indicated that AR significantly improved student participation and information retention, with students using AR-based resources demonstrating higher engagement and comprehension compared to those using traditional materials. The research also highlighted the need for teacher training in AR-based instruction and the value of student involvement in developing AR applications. By employing a combination of theoretical and practical teaching strategies, the study showed that AR could effectively support the visualization and problem-solving of complex physics concepts. Additionally, the study emphasized the broader applications of AR and VR technologies in fields such as medicine and engineering, suggesting the importance of continued research and investment to unlock their full educational potential while addressing accessibility challenges.</p> <p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>:</em> Augmented reality; education; physics; virtual reality </p>2025-02-28T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Contemporary Educational Researches Journalhttps://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/cerj/article/view/9685Developing a lecturer ranking system based on student evaluations2025-04-29T15:24:28+03:00Vo Thi Nhu Uyenvothinhuuyen@haui.edu.vn<p>The quality of teaching is a critical component in enhancing student development within higher education. While student feedback is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool for assessing instructional effectiveness, existing evaluation systems often lack methodological diversity and fail to capture comprehensive performance insights. This study addresses the gap by proposing a multi-method faculty ranking system based on student evaluations, with a focus on a specific academic course. The objective is to develop a more nuanced and reliable mechanism for assessing teaching quality. Four distinct evaluation techniques were employed to rank faculty members: the Preference Selection Index (PSI) method, the Simple Ranking Process (SRP) method, the Ranking Analysis Method (RAM), and the Preference Index Value (PIV) method. These methods were systematically compared with each other and with conventional institutional practices. The analysis demonstrates that the proposed framework offers enhanced precision and consistency in ranking instructional performance. The findings highlight the potential for integrating multiple evaluative approaches to inform faculty development and support evidence-based decisions in academic management.</p> <p><strong><em>Keyword:</em></strong> Evaluation; lecturer; multi-criteria decision-making; ranking; student</p>2025-02-28T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Contemporary Educational Researches Journal