The similarities between animals and humans in terms of the attachment theory

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Attachment Theory is an approach that argues that the confidence inspired by the mother or by a mother substitute in an individual while still a baby leaves an emotional impact on the development of her offspring. The attachment theory, supported by studies on humans and animals, investigates the feelings of closeness and trust one living thing has for another. Many experiments made in this respect show that some feelings of humans and animals and their offspring are similar in terms of motivations and incentives. The most important of these are concepts such as childcare, abandonment anxiety and bonds of trust and security. In this study, several different scientific studies conducted on animals in terms of the Attachment Theory have been critically reviewed.  Moreover, also included in this study is research on the mother-child relationship as compared with studies conducted on animals and their offspring. In the comparisons and evaluations carried out, the psychological effects of bonding, like those in humans, were also observed in animals.

Keywords: attachment theory, mothercare, animals, bowlby theory

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
The similarities between animals and humans in terms of the attachment theory. (2017). Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 6(4), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v6i4.1413
Section
Articles

References

Denscombe, M. (2006). The good Research Guide (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Hiler, J. (2002). Blogs as disruptive tech: How Weblogs are flying under the radar of the content of management giants. (ON-LINE Retrieved on 22/4/2012 from http://www.novelbooksinc.com/ourstories/blogsdisruptivetech.htm )

Leslie, S. and Landon, B. (2008).Social software for learning: what is it, why use it?Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, 2008. p.4

MacBride, R. & Luehmann, A. L. (2008).Capitalizing on Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of Classroom Blogging’. School Science and Mathematics. Vol. 108 (5) 173 – 108

Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.

Saeed, N & Yang, Y. (2008). Incorporating Blogs, Social Bookmarks, and Podcasts into Unit Teaching. (ON-LINE Retrieved from http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/personal/yyang/Publications.html on 10/1/ 2009)

Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools.Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

Vaidhyanathan, S. (2008). Generational myth. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(4), B.7.

Zein, R. (2014). Explorative Study on the Ways of using Blogs and Wikis as Teaching and Learning Tools in Mathematics. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014, Jacksonville, Florida 17-21 March 2014 (pp. 66-72). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Zein, R. (2015a). How Do Blogs and Wikis Support Social Constructivist Learning in Math. In Proceedings of Global Learn 2015, Berlin, Germany 16-17 April 2015 (pp. 18-27). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Zein, R. (2015b). Literature Review on Web 2.0 Conceptual Framework and Characteristics. In Proceedings of Global Learn 2015, Berlin, Germany 16-17 April 2015 (pp. 612-621). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Zein, R. & Majdalani, M. (2012). Implementation of Blogs and Wikis in a Middle School Math Class: An Exploratory Case Study. In P. Resta (Ed.), In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 , Texas , Austin, 5-9 March 2012 (pp. 3177-3182). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Zemsky, R., & Massy, W. F. (2004). Thwarted innovation: What happened to e-learning and why. (ON-LINE Retrieved from http://www.irhe.upenn.edu/Docs/Jun2004/ThwartedInnovation.pdf)