Metaphors in “The Elements of Language” by E.Sapir
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research is aimed at identifying metaphors and building metaphorical models underlying the scientific article on linguistics "The Elements of Language" by E.Sapir on the grounds of cognitive linguistics. It also provides classification and analysis of the metaphors used in the scientific text under question and correlation of the researcher's metaphorical models with the core ones in Linguistics. The methodology is based on the cognitive principle that each scientific text has a sense productive structure, derivative from a scientific cognitive and communicative situation, with particular stages of sense development represented in all subtexts of the scientific text. Cognitive and linguistic analyses are procedures used to identify the subtexts, metaphors (Steen 2002), to analyse and classify the latter and to build metaphorical models. The analysis revealed that E.Sapir uses mostly three kinds of metaphors: dead, conventional scientific and original (his own). Dead metaphors dominate in all the subtexts of the article. The most frequent and sense developing metaphorical models are the ones referring to Human and Nature and to Human and Results of Labour.
Keywords: metaphor, metaphorical model, scientific text, subtext, linguistics, sapir
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Boyd, R. (1979). Metaphor and Theory change. Metaphor and Thought. Second Edition: Cambridge University Press. 356-408.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133-187.
Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science. Metaphor and Thought. 447-480. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press . Kozhina, М. (2002). Speech Studies and Functional Stylistics: questions of theory. Selected works. Perm. Perm State University Press. 475.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Metaphor and Thought. Second Edition: Cambridge University Press. 202-252.
MacCormac, E. (1976). Metaphor and myth in science and religion. Duke University Press. 167.
Richards, A. (1971). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 98.
Sapir, E. (1921). The Sounds of Language. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Steen, G. (2002). Towards a procedure for metaphor identification. Language and literature. V.11; 17