Framed autoethnography as an approach for uncovering pedagogic frailty

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jul 16, 2016
Versions:
2016-07-16 (1)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v6i1.490

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract

Pedagogic frailty has been proposed as a concept that can be helpful in bringing a number of key ideas into simultaneous focus, with the aim of helping to integrate elements of teaching quality enhancement within a university (Kinchin, 2015; 2016). These elements include the relationship between personal values and the instructional discourse; the relationship between the discipline and its pedagogy; the nature of the research-teaching nexus; the proximity of the locus of control to the teaching environment. Key to the application of pedagogic frailty is the personal appreciation (at the level of the individual academic) of the ways in which the elements of this concept are connected. This must acknowledge the emotional aspects of teaching and learning and also the rich, subjective nature of personal professional identities within this context (Clegg, 2008). We have therefore investigated the potential of autoethnography (e.g. Anderson, 2006; Chang, 2008; Denshire, 2014) as an approach to uncovering the rich complexity of pedagogic frailty perceived at the level of the individual. We have combined this with a concept mapping approach (Novak, 2010) to frame the autoethnographic narrative and to help the autoethnographer to focus on connections between elements as these connections will determine how the framework functions in practice. This combined approach helps overcome the difficulties associated with writing about academia from the insider’s perspective (Archer, 2008). This paper offers reflections upon this process as a method for professional development of university teachers and institutional quality enhancement.

 

 

Keywords: Autoethnography; concept mapping; faculty development; quality enhancement

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Framed autoethnography as an approach for uncovering pedagogic frailty. (2016). Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 6(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v6i1.490
Issue
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2016): February
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Acosta, S., Goltz, H.H. and Goodson, P. (2015) Autoethnography in action research for health education practitioners. Action Research, 0(0): 1 – 21. DOI: 10.1177/1476750315573589
Anderson, L. (2006) Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 373 – 395.
Archer, L. (2008) Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 385 – 403.
Booth, T. (2014) Structuring knowledge for all in the 21st Century. In: Amrhein, B. and Dziak-Mahler, M. (Eds.) Fachdidaktik inklusiv: Auf der Suche nach didaktischen Leitlinien fur den Umgang mit Vielfalt in der Schule. (pp. 57 – 70). Muenster, Waxmann.
Caňas, A. J., Novak, J. D., and Reiska, P. (2015) How good is my concept map? Am I a good Cmapper? Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 7(1), 6-19.
Canning, J. (2007) Pedagogy as a discipline: emergence, sustainability and professionalisation. Teaching in Higher Education, 12: 393 - 403.
Chang, H. (2008) Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F.W. and Hernandez, K.C. (2013) Collaborative autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Clegg, A. and Young, J. (2011) The frailty syndrome. Clinical Medicine, 11(1), 72 – 75.
Clegg, S. (2008) Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal, 34, 329 – 345.
Denshire, S. (2014) On auto-ethnography. Current Sociology Review, 62(6), 831 – 850.
Edmunds, S. and Brown, G. (2012), Doing qualitative research in dentistry and dental education. European Journal of Dental Education, 16, 110–117.
Hay, D.B., I.M. Kinchin, and S. Lygo-Baker. (2008) Making learning visible: the role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295 – 311.
Holt, N.L. (2003) Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An auto-ethnographic writing story. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 1–22.
Kandiko, C., Hay, D., and Weller, S. (2013) Concept mapping in the humanities to facilitate reflection: Externalizing the relationship between public and personal learning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 12(1), 70-87.
Kandiko Howson, C.B. and I.M. Kinchin. (2014) Mapping the doctorate: A longitudinal study of PhD students and their supervisors. In: Shedletsky, L. and Beaudry, J.S. (Eds.) Cases on Teaching Critical Thinking through Visual Representation Strategies. (pp. 445 – 464) IGI Global.
Kinchin, I.M. (2015) Pedagogic frailty: an initial consideration of aetiology and prognosis. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE). 9th – 11th December, Celtic Manor, Wales.
Kinchin, I.M. (2016) Visualising powerful knowledge to develop the expert student: A knowledge structures perspective on teaching and learning at university. Rotterdam, Sense Publishers.
Kinchin, I.M., Alpay, E., Curtis, K., Franklin, J., Rivers, C., and Winstone, N.E. (2016) Charting the elements of pedagogic frailty. Submitted for publication.
Kinchin, I.M., D. Streatfield, and D.B. Hay. (2010) Using concept mapping to enhance the research interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 9(1), 52 – 68.
Lipsitz, L.A. (2002) Dynamics of stability: the physiologic basis of functional health and frailty. Journal of Gerontology, 57A(3): B115 - B125.
MacIntosh, R, Beech, N, McQueen, J and Reid, I. (2010) Overcoming change fatigue; lessons from Glasgow’s NHS.” Journal of Business Strategy, 28(6), 18 – 24.
Novak, J.D. (2010) Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd Edn.). London: Routledge.
O’Byrne, P. (2007) The advantages and disadvantages of mixing methods: an analysis of combining traditional and autoethnographic approaches. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1381 – 1391.
Rockwood, K., Fox, R. A., Stolee, P., Robertson, D., and Beattie, B. L. (1994) Frailty in elderly people: an evolving concept. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 150(4), 489 - 495.
Samuelowicz, K., and Bain, J.D. (1992) Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93 - 111.
Seeman, T. E., Singer, B. H., Ryff, C. D., Love, G. D., and Levy-Storms, L. (2002). Social relationships, gender, and allostatic load across two age cohorts. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(3), 395-406.
Tolich, M. (2010) A critique of current practice: Ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographers. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 1599 – 1610.