Behaviours and working strategies judged useful for improving the quality of higher education: Results of chemistry students’ judgments at the Faculty of Science Ben M’sik-Casablanca
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study, we are mainly interested in the level of students’ satisfaction about their courses quality, as well as the
different strategies judged useful by students to improve higher education. A total of 302 chemistry students of different
levels from the first year to the Master participated in this survey; they are between 18 and 28 years. The analysis of the
results shows that student’s dissatisfaction is patent and the teachers are not interested enough to motivate their students.
For this, students can engage in personal actions to improve their general culture, to expand their field of knowledge and
improve their chances of employment.
Keywords: Quality of teaching, chemistry students’ motivation, behaviours and working strategies, Moroccan university.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
• Duru-Bellat, M. (2007). L’évaluation de la qualité du contexte scolaire: dérive managériale ou exigence démocratique? In M. Behrens (Ed.), La qualité en éducation (pp 127-155). Québec : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
• Houssaye .Jean (sous la direction de) (1993) « La motivation », dans La pedagogie : une encyclopedie pour aujourd’hui », ESF, edition Paris.
• N'DA, P., (2002), p80 Methodologie de la recherche de la problematique a la discussion des resultats, Abidjan : EDUCI.
• OCDE (1999). Qualité et internationalisation de l’enseignement supérieur.
• OSMA, Islam. & RADID, Mohamed. (2015).Analysis of the students' judgments on the quality of teaching received: case of chemistry students at the faculty of sciences Ben M'sik. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 197, 25 July 2015, Pages 2223-2228.
• Rege Colet, N. (sous presse). L'évaluation de l'enseignement au coeur des processus d'assurance qualité: l'arbre qui cache la forêt.
• Romainville, M., & Coggi, C. (Sous presse). L’évaluation de l’enseignement par les étudiants dans le supérieur: approches critiques et pratiques innovantes. Bruxelles : de Boeck
• Vial, M. (2001). Les missions du formateur et la qualité : entre désignation et attribution. Éducation permanente, 147 (2), 117-129.
• VIAU, R. (1994). La motivation en contexte scolaire. Quebec: ERPI.