The Views of University Students Regarding Internet Addiction

Main Article Content

Sevda Aslan

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to determine the views of university students regarding Internet addiction. The study group
consisted of 64 fourth year students studying at Kirikkale University Faculty of Arts and Sciences’ Department of Philosophy
and Kirikkale University Faculty of Health Sciences’ Department of Child Development in Spring 2013–2014 academic year. In
this study, university students’ views regarding Internet Addiction Form, which consists of nine open-ended questions, were
developed by the researcher in order to determine the university students’ views about Internet addiction. According the
findings of this research; not being able to fulfil the requirements of friendship, which are communication, sharing and
responsibility; trying to overcome those via social media; being lonely, they have scarcely any family ties, the adolescent
considers entering the courses and doing literature review in the library as a waste of time, and therefore, obtains
insufficient academic information solely from the Internet.

Keywords: University students, Internet addiction, student views.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aslan, S. (2016). The Views of University Students Regarding Internet Addiction. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 6(3), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v6i3.992
Section
Articles

References

Bargh, John A., and Katelyn Y. A. McKenna 2004. “The Internet and Social Life”. Annual Review of Psychology 55:573-590.

Butt, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 346–360.


Deniz, A. (2012). Sosyal ağ kullanımı ve sosyal ağlarda benlik algısı: Muğla ili örneği. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Fen Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.

Erikson, Erik H. (1968). Identity: Youth And Crisis. New York: Norton.

Hall, C. S. ve Lindzey, G. (1957). Theories of personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons Incompany.

Karasar, Niyazi (2003). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi-kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler [Scientific research method-concepts, principles, technique]. 12. Baskı. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Kılıçcı, Y. (2000). Okulda ruh sağlığı[Mental health in school]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Kraut Robert, Kiesler Sara, Boneva Bonka S., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). “Internet Paradox Revisited”. Journal of Social Issues, 58: 49–74.


Schwartz, S.J., Côté, J.E., & Arnett, J.J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood: Two developmental routes in the individualization process. Youth & Society, 37, 201–229.

Tiffany A. Pempek, Yevdokiya A. Yermolayeva, Sandra L. Calvert 2009. College Students' Social Networking Experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30: 227–238.

Thompson J. 2007. “Is Education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students?” Innovate 3:4. Retrieved from http://www.innovatconline.info/pdf/vol3_issue4/Is_Education_1.0_Ready_for_Web_2.0_Students_pdf