Empirical study on the important function of mobile interactive model for MOOC
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper was studied on the important function of mobile interactive model for the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) under Chinese context. We did empirical study to find out which function should be considered when designing a mobile MOOC platform. The author conducted a questionnaire in Distance Education School of Zhejiang University from the perspective of the main online learning users. We used the method of factor analysis by SPSS16.0 to analyze the research results. Through simplifying the interactive function of each module and analyzing the research results, the important function of mobile interactive model for MOOC composed of 5 modules and 7 factors were put forward. Our works have certain reference to the study of platform development and development for MOOC.
Â
Keywords: Mobile learning, Interactive mode, Factor analysis, MOOC.Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Global Journal of Computer Sciences: Theory and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles can be downloaded free of charge. Articles published in the Journal are Open-Access articles distributed under CC-BY license [Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)]
Birlesik Dunya Yenilik Arastirma ve Yayincilik Merkezi (BD-Center) is a gold open access publisher. At the point of publication, all articles from our portfolio of journals are immediately and permanently accessible online free of charge. BD-Center articles are published under the CC-BY license [Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)], which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and the source are credited.
References
Abdusselam, M., S. (2014). Teacher and Student Views on the Use of Augmented Reality Environments in Physics Education, Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 4(1), 59-74
Adiguzel, T., Gurbulak, N. & Saricayir, H. (2011). Smart Boards and Instructional Applications, Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8, 457-471.
Akdag, M., & Tok, H. (2008). Effect of Traditional Instruction and Power Point Presentation Supported Instruction on Students’ Accessibility, Education and Science, 33(147).
Akkagit, S., F., & Tekin, A. (2011). An educational tool for logic doors. 5th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium, Fırat University, Elazıg, Turkey, 564-568.
Akkagit, S., F., & Tekin, A. (2012). Effect of Simulation-based Learning on Success in Basic Electronic and Assessment Courses of Secondary School Students’, Ege Journal of Education, 2(13), 1–121.
Arvind, V., R., & Heard, J., W. (2010). Physics by simulation: Teaching circular motion using applets, Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 35-39.
Ayvaci, H., S., & Abdusselam, Z. (2012). The Effect of Animation-Assisted Cartoons in Science Teaching: 6th Grade Force Topic Example, Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 4(1).
Azar, A., & Sengulec, O., A. (2011). Computer-assisted and laboratory-assisted teaching methods in physics teaching: the effect on student physics achievement and attitude towards physics, Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 43-50.
Bakac, M., Tasoglu, A., K., & Akbay, T. (2011). The effect of computer assisted instruction with simulation in science and physics activities on the success of student: Electric current. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 32-42.
Baran, M., & Maskan, A., K. (2010). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Pre-Service Physics Teachers Electrostatic Achievements, Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4).
Bell, T., Urhahne D., Schanze S., & Ploetzner R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges, International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349-377.
Binder, K., & Heermann, D., W. (2010). Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics: An Introduction. Springer.
Bozkurt, E. (2007).The effect of a virtual laboratory application that is prepared for Physics education on student success compared to traditional laboratory: RC circuit example in direct current. Received from: http://pietc2008.home.anadolu.edu.trietc200860.doc
Bozkurt, E., & Ilik, A. (2010). The effect of computer simulations over students’ beliefs on physics and physics success. Presidia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2(2010), 4587–4591
Bozkurt, E., & Sarikoc, A. (2008). Can virtual laboratories substitute traditional laboratories in Physics education? Selcuk University Journal of Ahmet Kelesoglu Faculty of Education, 25, 89-100.
Bradley, P. (2006).The history of simulation in medical education and possible future aspects. Med Educ, 40, 254-262.
Bulbul Y. (2010). Effects of learning Cycle Model Accompanied with Computer Animations on Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis Concepts, Post Graduate Thesis, ODTU, Ankara
Buyukkara, S. (2011).The effect of teaching voice unit of science and technology lessons to grade 8 Elementary School students with computer simulations and animations on student success and attitude (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Selcuk University Institute of Educational Sciences.
Buyukozturk, S. (2007). Data Analysis Manual for Social Sciences (7th Edition). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing Company.
Chen, S. (2010). The view of scientific inquiry conveyed by simulation-based virtual laboratories, Computers & Education, 55(3), 1123–1130.
Civelek, T., Ucar, E. Gokcol, O., Ustunel, H., &Umut, I. (2013). The effects of computer assisted physics experiment simulations on students' learning. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(4), 457-471.
Celen, F. K., Celik, A., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2011). Turkish Education System and PSA Results. Academic IT, 2011, 2-4 February 2011, Ä°nonu University, Malatya.
Cildir, S. (2012).Visualization of Limit in Computer Environment and The Views of Prospective Teachers on This Issue, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 42, 143-153.
Coskun, A., & Ozdemir, M., (2013). The Effect of Computer Aided Instruction on Academic Achievement (Among High School Students) on the Subject ‘Motion on the Earth Surface’. Cukurova University, Journal of Science and Engineering, 29(3).
Dasdemir, I., & Doymus, K. (2012). The Effect of Using Animation on Students' Academic Achievement, Retention of These Achievements and Development of Scientific Process Skills in Force and Motion Curriculum of Science and Technology in Eighth Grade Primary School, Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1 (1).
Demir, C., & Demir, S. (2014). The Investigation of Physics Teachers’ Use of Special Teaching Methods in Their Lessons, International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education.
Dincer, S., & Guclu, M. (2013). Effectiveness of using simulation in computer aided learning and new trends in science education: A meta-analysis study article, International Journal of Human Sciences, 10.
Dogan, M. & Marulcu, İ. (2010). Physics teachers’ and their students’ opinions about the current physics curricula and textbooks in Afyon karahisar, Erciyes University, Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 29(2), 193-209.
Doymus, K., Simsek, U., & Karacop, A. (2009). The effects of computer animations and cooperative learning methods in micro, macro and symbolic level learning of states of matter. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 36, 109-128.
Emrahoglu, N., & Bulbul, O. (2010). Simulations and animations effects in computer assisted instruction on academic success and retention when teaching the optic unit in Physics in the ninth grade, C.U. Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 19(3), 409-422.
Eren, C., D., & Gurdal, A. (2010). The effect of teaching physics with fragmented teaching method on students' academic success, recalling the attitudes towards group work, Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 28, 67-79.
Ergul, N., R., & Cigrik, E. (2013).The Process of Knowledge Construction about the Concept of Electrical Power. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(1), 153-164.
Ergorun, O. (2010).The effect of Computer supported Physics instruction on students’ achievement and attitudes, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Yeditepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
Ergun, H. (2010).The Effect of Problem Design in Physics Education on Cognitive Learning and Problem Solving, PhD Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Education, Ä°stanbul.
Finkelstein, N., D., Perkins, K.K., Adams, W., Kohl, P., & Podolefsky, N. (2005). Can computer simulations replace real equipment in undergraduate laboratories? In AIP Conference Proceedings, 790, 101.
Fiscarelli, H., S., Bizelli, M., & Fiscarelli, P., E. (2013). Interactive Simulations to Physics Teaching: A Case Study in Brazilian High School International, Journal of Learning and Teaching, 5(1) 18-23.
Gunhaart, A., & Srisawasdi, N. (2012). Effect of Integrated Compute-based Laboratory Environment On Students’ Physics Conceptual Learning of Sound Wave Properties. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5750-5755.
Guven, G., & Sulun, Y. (2012).The Effect of Computer Supported Instruction on Academic Achievement and Students’ Attitudes Towards the Lesson in Eighth Grade Science and Technology Lessons, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(1).
Guvercin, Z. (2010).The effect of simulation-based software on students’ academic achievement, attitudes and retention in Physics lesson, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Cukurova University, Institute of Social Sciences, Adana.
Han, I., & Black, J., B. (2011). Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics, Computers & Education, 57, 2281–2290.
Hancer, A., H., & Tuzemen, A.T. (2008). A Research on the Effects of Computer Assisted Science Teaching, World Applied Sciences Journal, 4(2), 199-205.
Hoellwarth, C., Moetter, J., M. & Knight, R., D. (2005).A Direct Comparison of Conceptual Learning and Problem Solving Ability in Traditional and Studio Style Classrooms, American Journal of Physics, 73(5), 459-462.
Inac A. (2010). The Effect of Using Animations on Elementary School Students’ Academic Achievement in Science and Technology Lessons and on the Level of Retention: Example of Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Grades, Master’s Thesis, 18 Mart University, Canakkale
Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (1), 71-93.
Jian-Hua, S., & Hong, L. (2012). Explore the Effective Use of Multimedia Technology in College Physics Teaching. Energy Presidia 17 (2012) 1897 – 1900. 2012 International Conference on Future Electrical Power and Energy Systems.
Karaca, K. (2013). Views of Pre-service Teachers’ on Contribution of Visual Materials in Physics Instruction, Gazi University, Institute of Education, Ankara.
Karaca, N. (2010). The effects of computer-based animations on developing graphical and interpretation skills, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon.
Karacop, A. (2010).The effects of animation and jigsaw techniques on students’ understanding in the subjects of electrochemistry and chemical bonds units, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Ataturk University Institute of Science, Erzurum.
Karal, H., Çebi, A., & Pekşen, M. (2010). The web based simulation proposal to 8 th grade primary school students’ difficulties in problem solving. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4540-4545.
Katirci, E. & Satici, A. F. (2010). Effects of creating simulations in interactive physics application and developing portfolio on students’ academic self-concept and creativity, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(4), 46-59.
Kebtittchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010).The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation, Computers & Education, 55(2), 427–443.
Kert, S., B., & Tekdal, M. (2008).The Effects of Multimedia based Courseware Prepared on the Basis of Design Principles from Literature on the Academic Achievement and Retention in High School Physics Instruction, Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 23(1).
Kocakaya, S., & Gonen, S. (2010). The effects of computer-assisted instruction designed according to 7E model of constructivist learning on physics student teachers’ achievement, concept learning, self-efficacy perceptions and attitudes, The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 206-224.
Korkmaz, A. & Yildiz, A. (2012). Comparisons of Gender Differences, The Interactive of Physics Lessons and the Success of Classical Education in Secondary Schools, International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 1(3).
Koh, C., Tan, H.S., Tan, K.C., Fang, L., Fong, F.M., Kan, D., Lye, S. L., & Wee, M.L (2010). Investigating the Effect of 3D Simulation Based Learning on the Motivation and Performance of Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 237–251.
Kuvvetli, E. (2008). Researching the effect of visual readout on secondary school students’ achievement in physics lesson, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
Lateh, H. & Vasugiammai, M. (2011). Technology integrated teaching in Malaysian schools: GIS, a SWOT analysis, World Journal on Educational Technology, 3(2).
McDermott, L., C. (1993). How we teach and how students learn: a mismatch? Am J Phys 61, 295– 298.
Midik, O., & Kartal, M. (2010). Simulation-based Medical Education, Marmara Medical Journal, 23(3), 389-399
Odom, A., L., Marszalek, J., M., Stoddard, E., R., & Wrobel, J.M. (2011).Computers and Traditional Teaching Practices: Factors influencing middle level students’ science achievementand attitudes about science, International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2351–2374.
Ozen, Y., Gulacti, F., & Kandemir, M. (2006).The Problem of Validity and Reliability in Educational Research. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(1).
Patrick J. (2002). Simulation. In: Patric J, ed., Training: Research and Practice. London: Academic Press, 487-508.
Polat, E., & Tekin, A. (2013). The effect of web based education assisted by animation on academic success in the course of science and technology, International Journal of Human Sciences, 10 (Special Issue), 17-26.
Renken, M., D., & Nunez, N. (2013). Computer simulations and clear observations do not guarantee conceptual Understanding. Learning and Instruction, 23, 10-23.
Rotimi, C., O., Ajogbeje, O., O., & Akeju, S. (2012). A New Kind of Visual-Model Instructional Strategy in Physics, Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 28-32.
Rutten, N., Joolingen, W.R, & Van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education, Computers Education, 58, 136-153.
Sarabandoa, C., Cravino, J., P., & Soares, A.A. (2014).Contribution of a computer simulation to students’ learning of the physics concepts of weight and mass. Procedia Technology 13, 112 – 12.
Secer, I., Ay, I., Ozan, C., & Yilmaz, B.S. (2014). Research Trends in the Field of Guidance and Psychological Counselling: A Content Analysis, Turkish Psychological Counselling and Guidance Journal, 5(41), 49-60.
Smetana, L., K. & Bell, R., K. (2012). Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370.
Sokolowski, A. & Rackley, R. (2011). Teaching harmonic motion in trigonometry: Inductive inquiry supported by physics simulations. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 25(1) 2011.
Soderstrom, T., Hall L.O., Ahlqvist, J., & Nilsson, T. (2012). How Group Size and Composition Influences the Effectiveness of Collaborative Screen-Based Simulation Training: A Study of Dental and Nursing University Students Learning Radiographic Techniques, World Journal on Educational Technology, 4(3), 180-193
Sencan, H. (2005). Reliability and Validity in Social and Behavioural Evaluations, Ankara: Seckin Publishing Company.
Sendir, M. (2013). Using Simulation in Nursing Women’s Health. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 21(3), 205-212.
Tanel, Z., & Onder, F. (2010). Effect of Computer Simulations on Students’ Achievement at Electronics Laboratory: Example of Diode Experiments, 9 September, University Journal of Buca Faculty of Education.
Tanel, Z., & Tanel, R. (2010). Conditions of Physics Laboratories, Information Environments and Teachers’ Views on Their Use.9 September, University Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 27.
Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2011). Development Process of Virtual Chemistry Laboratory.International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium.Fırat University, Elazıg- Turkey.
Tekbiyik, A., & Akdeniz, A.R. (2010). Up To Date Physics Attitude Scale for Secondary School Students: Development, Validity and Reliability, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(4).
Tippmann, J.D., Kim, H., & Rhymer, J.R. (2013). Experimentally validated strain rate dependent material model for spherical ice impact simulation, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 57(2013) 43-54.
Trundle, K.C. & Bell, R.L. (2010). The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: a quasi- experimental study, Computers & Education, 54, 1078-1088.
Ulukok, S., Celik, H., & Sarı, U. (2013).The Effect of Computer Supported Applications about Simple Electric Circuits on the Development of Experimental Procedure Skills. AKU, Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 6(1), 77-101.
Venkataraman, B. (2009). Visualization and interactivity in the teaching of chemistry to science and non-science students, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 62–69
Wang, Z., Li, S., Yang, L., & Hao, A. (2013). Real-Time CUDA Based Collision Detection and Physics Based Collision Response Simulation, Global Journal on Technology, 3
Yener, D., Aydin, F., & Koklu, N. (2012). Examination of Students’ Self-efficacy who were Applied Animation-Simulation in Physics Laboratory, 10.International Congress on Science and Mathematics Education, Nigde University, Nigde.
Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences, Ankara: Seckin Publishing Company.
Yildiz, U., Solak, S., Altinisik, U. & Inal, M. (2012). Applications of Branched Software Simulation: Laboratory Applications of Information Technology Course, Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(4).
Yigit, N., Alev, N., Altun, T., Ozmen, H., & Akyıldız, S. (2005). Educational Technologies and Material Development, Trabzon: Derya Bookstores.
Yukselen, M., A. (2012). Computer Assisted Aerodynamics Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 47, 362 – 368.
Zabunov, S., S. (2013). The Effect of Points Construction in Online Stereo 3D Rigid Body Simulation on the Performance of Students in Mathematics and Physics, Eurasian Journal Physics & Chemistry Education, 5 (2), 111-119.