Assessing productivity to address safety concerns for information technology and promoting global standardization within aviation practices
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Comparing these concepts with the usage of productivity assessment current design standards in implementing technological systems create concerns in safety performances [5]. The technology developmental risk was a concern in the Wright Brother era and the approach in implementing best solution practices based on simulating and testing standards to meet the goals in today’s operation is still an issue [4]. Effective modeling in promoting environmental changes for operational practices can present a risk concern in the developmental approach if productivity is not assessed [1]. Steps are needed to be taken to improve the environmental factors in the business efforts of promoting alternative energy; nonetheless, the long-term effects of not prioritizing the development standards on the global level may cause risk concerns in assessing aviation practice [1]. Realizing the sensitivity of the system development and the tradeoffs in implementing effective practices can also create awareness in the long-term efforts of environmental factors and its impact on operational cost improvements [10]. The ethical standards for human factors to improve the quality of people lives in addressing the challenges faced may be a concern going into the 21st century [7]. The tradeoffs of prioritizing can present both pros and cons; however, developmental practices are risky without modeling long-term impact and exploring different applications in adopting business practices [6]. Flexibility is an importance aspect in evaluating the productivity of long-term practices while using modern technology [6]. The productivity assessment impact in future implications and it influences to integrate traditional technology within the modern environment.Â
Â
Keywords: IT, aviation practices, promoting
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Allaire, D., & Wilcox, K. (2010, August). Surrogate modeling for uncertainty assessment with application to aviation environmental system models. AIAA Journal, 48(8), 1791-1803.
Andersen, S. B., & Romanski, G. (2011, October). Verification of safety-critical software. Communications of the ACM, 54(10), 52-57.
Andrews, M. J., Bergeron, J. H., Creyf, L., Erkelens, C., Halloway, L. B., Murphy, G. F., & Schmitt, D. (2011, September). International transportation law. International Lawyer, 45(1), 313-327.
Bereiter, C. (2009, September). Innovation in the absence of principled knowledge: The case of the Wright Brothers. Creativity & Innovation Management, 18(3), 234-241.
Campbell, J. S., Castaneda, M., & Pulos, S. (2010). Meta-analysis of personality assessments as predictors of military aviation training success. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 20(1), 92-109.
Carr, E., Lee, M., Marin, K., Holder, C., Hoyer, M., Pedde, M.,...Touma, J. (2011). Development and evaluation of an air quality modeling approach to assess near-field impacts of lead emissions from piston-engine aircraft operating on leaded aviation gasoline. Atmospheric Environment, 45(32), 5795-5804.
Ethical standards for publication of aeronautics and astronautics research. (2011, Janurary). AIAA Journal, 49(1), 17.
Holly, P., Lee, D. S., & Hooper, P. D. (2012, April). The inclusion of the aviation sector within the European Union’s emissions trading scheme: What are the prospects for a more sustainable aviation industry? In Sustainable futures: Multi-disciplinary perspectives on multi-level transitions, 2, 48-56.
Lee, J. J. (2009). Can we accelerate the improvement of energy efficiency in aircraft systems? Energy Conversion and Management, 51(1), 189-196.
Najafi, F., Vidalis, S., Munksgaard, K., & Diamond, M. (2010). Effective environmental policy toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions produced from transportation. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 4(11), 113-131.
Peter, J. G. (2011). Aviation psychology and applied human factors. Germany: Hogrefe Publishing, 1(1), 1-2.
Renliang, J. (2012). The idea to promote the development of e-government in the civil aviation system. In International Conference on Applied Physics and Industrial Engineering, 1488-1492.
Renyu, F., & Man, Z. (2011). Low emission commercial aircraft engine combustor development in China: From airworthiness
requirements to combustor design. The 2nd International Symposium on Aircraft Airworthiness, 17, 618-626.
Sharma, V., Coit, D. W., Oztekin, A., & Luxhoj, J. T. (2009, September). A decision analytic approach for technology portfolio prioritization: aviation safety applications. Journal of Risk Research, 12(6), 843-864.
Yadav, V., Mueller, K. L., Dragoni, D., & Michalak, A. M. (2010). A geostatistical synthesis study of factors affecting gross primary productivity in various ecosystems of North America. Biogeosciences Discussions, 7(1), 1445-1487.