Family etiquette of Кazakhs

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 16, 2015
Versions:
2015-11-16 (1)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/gjs.v5i1.92

Main Article Content

Abstract

Authors in the article made an attempt to analyze the family etiquette of Kazakh people, and present an opportunity to reveal regularities to research deep roots, some rules of conduct and communication, factors to facilitate preservation of unique  national traits of the people, to make a full understanding of its moral-ethical views.  It is not a secrete, that the family etiquette contains the coded philosophical, historical, biological, psychological, social and ethnic information that unites all the people.   

Keywords: family etiquette, everyday conduct of Kazakhs, Kazakh family, traditional moral values, seniority hierarchy, taboos.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Family etiquette of Кazakhs. (2015). Global Journal of Sociology: Current Issues, 5(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjs.v5i1.92
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015): April
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Ataturk Ogretmen Akademisi (AOA). (2011), Received from October 3, 2011: http://www.aoa.edu.tr/page.aspx?id=130

Balci, F. A., & Yelken, T. Y. (2010). ilkogretim ogretmenlerinin “deger†kavramina yukledikleri anlamlar. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 39, 81-30

Basturk, S. (2010). Uygulama Ogretmenlerine Gore Okul Deneyimi Grubu Derslerin ve Ogretmen Adaylari. Turk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Fall, 8(4), 869-894.

Becit, G., Kurt, A. A., & Kabakci, I. (2009). Bilgisayar Ogretmen Adaylarinin Okul Uygulama Derslerinin Yararlarına iliskin Gorusleri, Anadolu Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 169–184.

Beden Egitimi ve Spor Yuksekokulu, Kocaeli Universitesi. (2012). Received December, 23, 2012 from: www.besyo.kocaeli.edu.tr

Buyukozturk, S., Kilic, C. E., Akgun, E. O., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel Arastirma Yontemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademik Yayinlari

Cakmak, M. (2009). Prospective Teachers’ Thoughts on Characteristics of an ‘Effective Teacher’. Education and Science, 34(153), 74-82.

Cokluk, O. (2011). Nitel Bir Gorusme Yontemi: Odak Grup Gorusmesi, Kuramsal Egitim Bilim, 4(1), 95-107.

Dursun, O. O., & Kuzu, A. (2008). Ogretmenlik Uygulaması Dersinde Yasanan Sorunlara Yonelik Ogretmen Adayı ve Ogretim Elemani Gorusleri. Selcuk Universitesi Ahmet Kelesoglu Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 25, 159 -178.

Karakelle, S. (2005). Ogretmenlerin Etkili Ogretmen Tanimlarinin Etkili Ogretmenlik Boyutlarina Gore incelenmesi. Egitim Ve Bilim, 30(135), 1-10.

Karamustafaoglu, O. (2009). (EJ871652) A Comparative Analaysis of The Models Of Teacher Education Ä°n Terms Of Teaching Practices In The USA, England and Turkey. Education, 130(2), 172-183.

Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–302.

Matyar, F., Denizoglu, A. G. P., & Ozcan, M. (2008). Sinif Ogretmenligi Abd’de Okuyan 4 sinif Ogrencilerinin ilkogretim Birinci Kademe Fen Ve Teknoloji Dersine iliskin Alan Bilgilerinin Belirlenmesi Cukurova Universitesi Ornegi. Çukurova Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 17(1), 303-312

Plecki, M. L., Elfers, A. M., & Nakamuro, Y. (2012). Using Evidence for Teacher Education Program Improvement and Accountability: An Illustrative Case of the Role of Value Added Measures. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 318-334.

Russell, M. L., & Russell, J. A. (2011). Mentoring Relationships: Cooperating Teachers’ Perspectives on Mentoring Student Interns. The Professional Educator, 35(2).

Sayeski, K. L., & Paulsen K. J. 2012. Student Teacher Evaluations of Cooperating Teachers as Indices of Effective Mentoring. Teacher Education Quarterly, Spring, 117-130.

Schussler, D. L., Stooksberry, L. M., & Bercaw, L. A. (2010). Understanding Teacher Candidate Dispositions: Reflecting to Build Self-Awareness. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 350-363.

Sisman, M., & Acat, B. (2003). Ogretmenlik Uygulaması Calismalarinin Ogretmenlik Mesleginin Algılanmasındaki Etkisi. Firat Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 235-250.

Snape, D., & Spencer, L. (2003). The Foundation of Qualitative Research, In Qualititative Research Practice, Edited by J. Ritche and J. Lewis, 1-23, London: Sage Publishs.

Yazici, H. (2009). Ogretmenlik Meslegi, Motivasyon Kaynaklari ve Temel Tutumlar: Kuramsal Bir Bakis. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 17(1), 33-46.

Yesilyurt, E., & Semerci, C. (2011). Uygulama Ogretmenlerinin Ogretmenlik Uygulamasi Surecinde Karsilastiklari Sorunlar ve Cozum Onerileri. Akademik Bakis Dergisi, 27, 1-23.

Yıldırım, A., & Simsek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastirma Yontemleri. (5. Baski). Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik.

Ziebarth-Bovill, J., Kritzer, J., & Bovill, R. (2012). The essential criteria for hiring first year teacher candidates. Education, 133(1), 125-138.