Ethics of natural family planning (NFP) vs ethics of contraception
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article analyses the moral difference between Natural Family Planning (NFP) and contraception. Problem Statement: Today one of the most frequently asked questions is the following: if contraception and NFP both have the same purpose of avoiding pregnancy, how can there be any moral difference between them. Moreover, people state that it does not make any difference which method is used, if the end and purpose are the same. In fact, proponents of contraceptives often argue that there is no moral difference between contraception and NFP and even treat NFP as a natural form of contraception. Purpose of the study: To disclose the ethical/moral difference between contraception and NFP. Research methods: Theoretical structural method was used for thorough understanding of human person as a bodily and sexual being. Comparative analysis was used to find the distinction between Christian anthropology and dualistic anthropology. Action assessment criteria were used to evaluate the difference between contraceptive action and contraceptive purpose. Findings: In order to show the moral difference between contraception and NFP, firstly thorough understanding of human person as a bodily and sexual being is given, the difference of the use of NFP and contraception in the aspect of human dignity is revealed, and then a distinction between a contraceptive action and a contraceptive will is drawn. Conclusion. The end or purpose of family planning does not make all of the various practices ethically the same. NFP is not a natural contraception; it is the ethical opposite.
Â
Keywords: Christian anthropology, dualistic anthropology; bodility; sexuality; natural family planning; contraceptive action; conjugal act.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Anderson, C., & Granados, J. (2009). Called to love. NY: Doubleday.
Finnis, J. (1991). Moral absolutes: Tradition, revision and truth. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
Have, H. A. M, Meulen, R. H. J., & Leeuwen, E. (2003). Medicinos etika (Ethics of Medicine). Vilnius: Charibde.
Pope John Paul II. (1997). The theology of the body: Human love in the divine plan. Pauline Books & Media.
Kippley, J. & Kippley, S. The Art of Natural Family Planning, Cincinnati, OH, The Couple to Couple League, 1996 (pp. 83-84). ISBN 0-926412-13-2.
Lawler, R. D., Boyle, J. M., & May, W. E. (1998). Catholic sexual ethics: A summary, explanation & defense. Our Sunday Visitor Publishing.
May, W.E. (1981). Sex, marriage and chastity: reflections of a Catholic layman, spouse and parent. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press.
May, W.E. (2000). Catholic bioethics and the gift of human life. Huntington: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division.
Narbekovas, A. (2000). The existential significance of human acts as freely chosen. Soter, 4 (32), 29-37.
Narbekovas, A. (2002). Pasyvios eutanazijos ir uzsispyrelisko gydymo netaikymo skirtumas. Soter, 7 (35), 7-18.
Narbekovas, A. (2001). The Ethics of Euthanasia. Sveikatos mokslai (Health science). 3-4, 76-84
Narbekovas, A., ObelenienÄ—, B., JuÅ¡keviÄius, K., Meilius, K., ValanÄiÅ«tÄ—, A., RudaleviÄienÄ—, P., ... & BartkeviÄienÄ—, D. (2012). Medicina, etika ir teisÄ— apie žmogų iki gimimo.
Narbekovas, A., Obeleniene, B. & Pukelis, K. (2008). Lytiskumo ugdymo etika (The ethics of sexuality education). Kaunas: Vytautas Magnus university.
Pelegrino, E. D & Thomasma, D. C. (1996). The Christian Virtues in Medical Practice. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
Smith, E. J. (1993). Pope John Paul II and HumanaeVitae. Why Humanae Vitae was Right: A Reader / Ed. Smith, E.J. San Francisco.
Wojtyla, K. (1994). Meile iratsakomybe (Love and responsibility). Vilnius: Alka.
World Health Organization (1988). Natural family planning. Geneve.