This is an outdated version published on 2016-12-07. Read the most recent version.
What Role does the Teachers’ Union in Wisconsin have on Student Achievement?
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 7, 2016
Updated:
2016-12-07
Main Article Content
Abstract
Wisconsin has had mandated membership in its teacher’s union for all public school teachers since 1959. In 2010, Wisconsin’s teachers’ unions have been under discussion when the new governor came into office and signed Act 10 into law, which allowed all public school teachers to have a choice in membership. Much debate, discussion and furor has surrounded this legislation. The purpose of this paper considers the impact the teacher’s union has had on student achievement according to unionized and non-union teachers and the state standardized assessment.
Keywords: Wisconsin; teacher’s union, student success; WKCE; non-union; student achievement; math; reading; 8th grade
Â
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Happel, T. (2016). What Role does the Teachers’ Union in Wisconsin have on Student Achievement?. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v2i3.1054
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Borland, M. & Howsen, R. (1992). Student academic achievement and the degree of market concentration in education. Economics of Education Review 1 (11) pp. 31-39.
Carini, R. (2008a). Is collective bargaining detrimental to student achievement? Evidence from a national study. J. Collective Negotiations, 32(3) 215-235
Carini, R. (2008b). New directions for the study of collective bargaining in schools. J. Collective Negotiations, 32(4) 317-328
Carini (2014). Personal communication
Eberts, R. W. (2007). Teachers Unions and Student Performance: Help or Hindrance? Future of Children, 17(1), 175-200.
Hoxby, C. M. (1996). How teachers' unions affect education production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 671-718.
Kurth, M. M. (1987). Teachers’ unions and excellence in education: An analysis of the decline in SAT scores. Journal of Labor Research, 8(4), 351-367.
Lindy, B. (2011). The Impact of Teacher Collective Bargaining Laws on Student Achievement: Evidence from a New Mexico Natural Experiment Yale Law Journal. Vol. 120 Issue 5, p1130-1191. 62p.
Lovenheim, M. (2009). The Effect of Teachers’ Unions on Education Production: Evidence from Union Election Certifications in Three Midwestern States. Journal of Labor Economics. 525, NORC at the University of Chicago; Society of Labor Economists; The University of Chicago Press
Milkman, M. (1997). Teachers' unions, productivity, and minority student achievement. Journal of Labor Research, 18(1), 137-150. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/214021447?accountid=7374
Moe, T. (2011). Special interest: Teacher's unions and America's Public Schools. Brookings Institute, Washington D.C.
Murphy, M. J. (1985). The impact of collective bargaining on school management and governance. Public Budgeting & Finance, 5(1), 3-14.
Nicholson-Crotty, S., Grissom, J. A. & Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2012). Governance and the impact of public employee unions on organizational performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), 422-448.
Nixon, A., Packard, A. & Dam, M. (2011). Teacher contract non-renewal: Southeast and midwest principals. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation. 6, 4
Weingarten, R. (2011). Voicing concerns, crafting solutions: Unions in the age of teacher bashing. Education Review, 24(1).
Winkler, A. M., Scull, J., Zeehandelaar, D. & Fordham, T. B. (2012). How strong are U.S. teacher unions? A state-by-state comparison. Fordham Institute.
Yusim, S. E. (2008). Teacher unionism: Past, present, and future. A study to determine the future of union involve ment in school reform. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304808658?accountid=7374 .
http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/related/acts/10 , Retrieved December 8, 2014.
Carini, R. (2008a). Is collective bargaining detrimental to student achievement? Evidence from a national study. J. Collective Negotiations, 32(3) 215-235
Carini, R. (2008b). New directions for the study of collective bargaining in schools. J. Collective Negotiations, 32(4) 317-328
Carini (2014). Personal communication
Eberts, R. W. (2007). Teachers Unions and Student Performance: Help or Hindrance? Future of Children, 17(1), 175-200.
Hoxby, C. M. (1996). How teachers' unions affect education production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 671-718.
Kurth, M. M. (1987). Teachers’ unions and excellence in education: An analysis of the decline in SAT scores. Journal of Labor Research, 8(4), 351-367.
Lindy, B. (2011). The Impact of Teacher Collective Bargaining Laws on Student Achievement: Evidence from a New Mexico Natural Experiment Yale Law Journal. Vol. 120 Issue 5, p1130-1191. 62p.
Lovenheim, M. (2009). The Effect of Teachers’ Unions on Education Production: Evidence from Union Election Certifications in Three Midwestern States. Journal of Labor Economics. 525, NORC at the University of Chicago; Society of Labor Economists; The University of Chicago Press
Milkman, M. (1997). Teachers' unions, productivity, and minority student achievement. Journal of Labor Research, 18(1), 137-150. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/214021447?accountid=7374
Moe, T. (2011). Special interest: Teacher's unions and America's Public Schools. Brookings Institute, Washington D.C.
Murphy, M. J. (1985). The impact of collective bargaining on school management and governance. Public Budgeting & Finance, 5(1), 3-14.
Nicholson-Crotty, S., Grissom, J. A. & Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2012). Governance and the impact of public employee unions on organizational performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), 422-448.
Nixon, A., Packard, A. & Dam, M. (2011). Teacher contract non-renewal: Southeast and midwest principals. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation. 6, 4
Weingarten, R. (2011). Voicing concerns, crafting solutions: Unions in the age of teacher bashing. Education Review, 24(1).
Winkler, A. M., Scull, J., Zeehandelaar, D. & Fordham, T. B. (2012). How strong are U.S. teacher unions? A state-by-state comparison. Fordham Institute.
Yusim, S. E. (2008). Teacher unionism: Past, present, and future. A study to determine the future of union involve ment in school reform. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304808658?accountid=7374 .
http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/related/acts/10 , Retrieved December 8, 2014.