Entrepreneurship Education in Higher Education Institutions: Estonian Case
Main Article Content
Abstract
The European Union (EU) faces the daunting challenge of emerging from the crisis and putting economies back on a sustainable growth path – there is still need of innovative, well-educated, and entrepreneurial citizens who have the spirit and inquisitiveness to think in new ways, and the courage to meet and adapt to the challenges. Entrepreneurship education (EE) is much broader concept than entrepreneurship as a practice of trade; it includes the entrepreneurship key competence that refers to an individual’s ability to turn ideas into action. Educational institutions stress the need to offer opportunities to increase entrepreneurial skills development (Bird, 2002). EE in European higher education institutions (HEI) is experiencing a growth; but there are still weaknesses (Varblane & Mets, 2010; Kyro & Carrier, 2005): for example, teaching of entrepreneurship for non-business industries is not sufficiently integrated in HEI’s curricula; education provides little training in entrepreneurship. In the article authors map and analyse the situation of EE in Estonian HEIs. Authors use classification (as proposed in Twaalfhoven, Suen & Prats, 2001), which distinguished three types of approach to entrepreneurship programme development: a) the research-oriented model; b) the “consulting†model; c) the teaching/practice-oriented student development model. Authors use case-study approach and for data-collecting method interview is used. Findings: EE should be more experiential and interdisciplinary; entrepreneurship should be the third career choice for students and be part of curricula; the EE should be supported by ecosystem, teaching methods must change, etc. Also we have recommendations what are implemented in developing special program of EU structural foundations.
Â
Keywords: entrepreneurship; Entrepreneurship education; Estonia; Higher education institutions;
ÂÂ
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
• Bernard, A (1998) « Motiver pour enseigner : analyse transactionnelle et pedagogie », Paris, Hachette Education.
• Duru-Bellat, M. (2007). L’évaluation de la qualité du contexte scolaire: dérive managériale ou exigence démocratique? In M. Behrens (Ed.), La qualité en éducation (pp 127-155). Québec : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
• Houssaye .Jean (sous la direction de) (1993) « La motivation », dans La pedagogie : une encyclopedie pour aujourd’hui », ESF, edition Paris.
• N'DA, P., (2002), p80 Methodologie de la recherche de la problematique a la discussion des resultats, Abidjan : EDUCI.
• OCDE (1999). Qualité et internationalisation de l’enseignement supérieur.
• OSMA, Islam. & RADID, Mohamed. (2015).Analysis of the students' judgments on the quality of teaching received: case of chemistry students at the faculty of sciences Ben M'sik. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 197, 25 July 2015, Pages 2223-2228.
• Rege Colet, N. (sous presse). L'évaluation de l'enseignement au coeur des processus d'assurance qualité: l'arbre qui cache la forêt.
• Romainville, M., & Coggi, C. (Sous presse). L’évaluation de l’enseignement par les étudiants dans le supérieur: approches critiques et pratiques innovantes. Bruxelles : de Boeck
• Vial, M. (2001). Les missions du formateur et la qualité : entre désignation et attribution. Éducation permanente, 147 (2), 117-129.
• VIAU, R. (1994). La motivation en contexte scolaire. Quebec: ERPI.