Strategies and Perspectives of School Actors during a Reform of Vocational Training in Luxembourg
Main Article Content
Abstract
Since 2008, a reform of vocational training is being implemented in the upper level of secondary education in Luxembourg. The new method consists of: a) teaching through competencies; b) modular training where modules can be repeated until achieved; c) evaluation has been changed from quantitative to qualitative. The reform continues to face ongoing challenges and resistance from the different actors involved in vocational training. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with the relevant actors in order to analyze their strategies and perspectives during and after the reform. A heuristic model of resistance to change in education was constructed, based on these interviews. The Ministry of Education took a top-down approach and implemented the reform quickly despite resistance from teachers. The majority of teaching staff disagreed with training through competencies as it was considered a more difficult approach than the previous knowledge-based methods. School administrations were opposed to modular training, in their view it was too complicated to implement. Enterprises were in favor of curricula based on competencies, as they are more suited to the practical work expected in the professional domain. Parents found it difficult to understand the new terminology and evaluation system. Pupils tended to postpose their efforts in achieving training modules and therefore accumulated uncompleted work which contributed to administrative overload. A general fatigue with the reform has spread, even if most of the actors agree at least verbally with its general philosophy; and this at a moment when the Ministry wants to implement new changes to the aforementioned law. In order to make the reform viable, a new negotiated agreement based on the interests of the different players should be achieved.   Â
Â
Keywords: vocational training; secondary education; competencies; interviews
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
• Claude THELOT (1993). The evaluation of the educational system, Nathan, p.7.
• Gaston Bachelard, (1999). The training of the scientific spirit, Paris, philosophical Bookshop Vrin. (1st ed. 1938)
• Gérard Scallon (1991). Formative Evaluation of the programming. Quebec, presses of the University of Laval, Tome I, 3 Ed.
• Hamadi AKRIM, Gérard Figari, Lucie MOTTIER-Lopez and Mohammed TALBI (2010). The place of evaluation in the reform of the Moroccan educational system: Questions for the research. Questions Vives, research in education v.4 / N°13.
• Hamadi AKRIM, said EL JAMALI, Amina El BOUSAADANI, Mohamed RADID and Mohammed TALBI (2006). The integration of QCM in the continuous control of the 1st year students SMP University and MSC. The case of General Chemistry. African Journal of the teaching of science and mathematics, Number 1.
• Steven SHAPIN (1996). The scientific revolution. Chicago. University of Chicago Press
• The National Charter of education and training, (1999) edited by the Special Commission of Education and Training (COSEF). Morocco.
• The emergency program (2009-2012): program developed by the Moroccan Ministry of National Education, Higher Education, Executive Training and Scientific Research in order to accelerate the implementation of the reform of the education and training.
• The programs and teaching guidelines of secondary education college of physics-chemistry (March 2015) developed by the Moroccan Ministry of National Education and vocational training.
• The programs and teaching guidelines of secondary education qualifier of the physics-chemistry (November 2007) developed by the Moroccan Ministry of National Education, Higher Education, Executive Training and Scientific Research in order to accelerate the implementation of the reform of the education and training.