The Views of Teacher Candidates on Self and Peer Assessment of Performance Assignments and Using Rubric
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study, the views of the teacher candidates on self and peer assessment of performance assignments and using rubric (scoring scale) in this process, are determined. The views of 158 students in total from Mathematics, Turkish and Science Teaching departments on the study, carried out during Mehmet Akif Ersoy University in 2014-2015 Fall term, are taken. The views of the teacher candidates are taken with interview form consisted of open-ended questions; not structured. An example application related to rubric is done before scoring. During the scoring of performance assignments, teacher candidates graded works of their peers studying in different classes firstly without using rubric, then, they graded by using rubric. Afterward, they graded their own performance assignments by means of using generally (non-rubric) and gradually rubric. Therefore, for the same performance assignments, 4 separate score were obtained, and these scores were reported to teacher candidates. At the end of the process, the opinions of the teacher candidates were taken. Qualitative data reached by means of the views of the teacher candidates on the process are analyzed in descriptive way. In respect of findings, the students emphasized that self and peer assessment increased self-confidence of them participating in the assessment process. Besides, they pointed out that they compared their own work by seeing the work of their peers and realized its shortcomings. Analysing teacher candidates’ opinions subjected to rubric, the teacher candidates stressed that they learned how scoring should be done, and what you need to pay attention in their careers. Also more reliable results are taken by use of rubric’s providing the chance of multi-directional and objective assessment. Moreover it is seen that the students, who have had hesitations on scoring process at the beginning, present positive opinions at the end.   Â
Â
Keywords: self-assessment; peer assessment; performance assignment;rubric ( scoring scale).
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
References
Bota, A. (2006). Physical Exercises for an Active Life – Motric activities for leisure time, University Book Publishing House, Bucharest, 16, 20-47.
Dragnea, A., & Bota, A. (1999). Theory of Motric Activities. Didactic and Pedagogical Publishing House R.A., Bucharest, 8., 10, 24.
Epuran, M. (2005). The Methodology of Research for Body Activities. Physical Exercise. Sport. Fitness, Second Edition, Bucharest, FEST, 298-302, 381, 403.
Freud A. (2002). The Self and Defense Mechanisms, The Generation Foundation Publishing House, Bucharest, Chapter 1, 2.
Gardner H., (2005), Disciplined Mind, SIGMA, Bucharest, Chapters I-III.
Golu, M. (2002). Fundaments of Psychology I, II, Romania of Tomorrow Publishing House, Bucharest, 544, 545-549.
Horst H., S. (2000). Personality Tests. Profiles and Types of Personality. Complete Tests and Exercises. Analyses and Evaluations. 400 Questions. Gemma Pres Publishing House, Bucharest, 150, 151, 152, 169, 150-170.
Jensen, C. (1995). Outdoor Recreation in America. Human Kinettics, America.