Evaluating the Weights of Criteria for Decoupling Point Positioning l
Main Article Content
Abstract
Today, enterprises might implement different supply chain strategies for different products in order to survive and to increase their market shares. The use of alternative supply chain strategies requires different decoupling points. But positioning this point for leagile strategies is not as easy as in lean and agile supply chains. The purpose of this study is to calculate the weights of criteria effective in determining the position of a decoupling point for the leagile strategy of a furniture components manufacturing firm. For that purpose a two-stage decision making method was used. In the first stage, Fuzzy Dematel method was used to determine the interactions and causal relationships between criteria and to identify the causal diagram. In the second stage, weights of criteria were calculated by Dematel based Analytic Network Process method. The findings revealed that the most important criterion was backorder cost.
Keywords: leagile supply chain; decoupling point; Dematel based analytic network process; Dematel; ANP; supply chain strategyDownloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Ambe, I. M. (2010). Agile supply chain: Strategy for competitive advantage. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 7, 5-17.
Chang, B., Chang, C. W. & Wu, C.H. (2011). Fuzzy dematel method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Systems with Applications. 38 (3), 1850-1858.
Christopher, M. & Towill, D.R. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution&Logistics Management. 31 (4), 235- 246.
Christopher, M. & Towill, D.R. (2002). Developing market specific supply chain strategies. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 13 (1), 1-14.
Dagdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., Kurt, M. & Dizdar, E. N. (2005). Tedarikçi seçim problemine analitik ag süreci ile alternatif yaklaşim. Teknoloji. 8 (2), 115-122.
Ferreira, K. A. & Alcantara, R.L.C. (2016). Postponement adoption in manufacturers of tomato-derived products. British Food Journal, 118 (2), 272-285.
Hallgren, M. & Olhager, J. (2009). Lean and agile manufacturing: External and internal drivers and performance outcomes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29 (10), 976-999.
Hemmati, S. & Rabbani, M. (2010). Make-to-order/Make-to-stock partitioning decision using the analytic network process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 48 (5-8), 801-813.
Hilletofth, P. (2009). How to develop a differentiated supply chain strategy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109 (1), 16-33.
Hsu,C.-Y., Chen, K. T. & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). FMCDM with fuzzy dematel approach for customers' choice behavior model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 9 (4), 236-246.
Hsu,C.-H., Wang, F. K. & Tzeng, G.-H. (2012). The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM Model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66, 95-111.
Huang, S.H., Uppal, M. & Shi, J. (2002). A product driven approach to manufacturing supply chain selection. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7 (4), 189-199.
Hung, C.-H. & Lee, W.-Y. (2016). A proactive technology selection model for new technology: The Case of 3D IC TSV. Technological Forecasting&Social Change, 103, 191-202.
Kuo, T.C., Hsu, C.-W. & Li, J.-Y. (2015). Developing a green supplier selection model by using the DANP with VIKOR. Sustainability, 7 (2), 1661-1689.
Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B. & Towill, D. R. (2000a). Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2 (1), 54-61.
Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B. & Towill, D. R. (2000b). Lean, agile or leagile? Matching your supply chain to marketplace, International Journal of Production Research, 38 (17), 4061-4070.
Nawaz, R. R., Reza, S. & Sarwar, B. (2013). Priorization of university choice dimensions using fuzzy dematel. Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences, 4 (2), 169-177.
Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M. & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62 (1-2), 107-118.
Olhager, J. (2003). Strategic positioning of the order penetration point. International Journal of Production Economics, 85 (3), 319-329.
Olhager, J. (2010). The role of the customer order decoupling point in production and supply chain management. Computers in Industry, 61 (9), 863-868.
Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G.-H. (2003). Defuzzification within a multicriteria decision model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11 (5), 635-652.
Rafiei, H. & Rabbani, M. (2011). Order partitioning AND order penetration point location IN hybrid make-to-stock/make-to-order production contexts. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61 (3), 550-560.
Stavrulaki, E. & Davis, M. (2010). Aligning products with supply chain processes and strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21 (1), 127-151.
Tseng, M. L. & Lin, Y. H. (2009). Application of fuzzy dematel to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 158 (1-4), 519-533.
Van Donk, D. P. (2000). Customer-driven manufacturing in the food processing industry. British Food Journal, 102 (10), 739- 747.
Van Donk, D.P. (2001). Make to stock or make to order: The decoupling point in the food processing industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 69 (3), 297-306.
Vinodh, S., Sundararaj, G. & Devadasan, S. R. (2009). Total agile design system model via literature exploration. International Management & Data Systems, 109 (4), 570-588.
Wikner, J. & Rudberg, M. (2005). integrating production and engineering perspectives on the customer order decoupling point. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (7), 623-641.
Wu, M., Ma F., Yang, H. & Sun, B. (2008). Study on the customer order decoupling point position base on profit. IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, 44-47, Beijing, China.
Wu, W.W. & Lee, Y.T. ( 2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy dematel method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32 (2), 499-507.
Wu, W.W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined anp and dematel approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35 (3), 828-835.
Zaerpour, N., Rabbani M., Gharehgozli, A. H. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. (2009). A comprehensive decision making structure for partitioning of make-to-order, make-to-stock and hybrid products. Soft Computing, 13 (11), 1035-1054.