The development of creative thinking of primary school students at the English lessons in Kazakhstan
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this article we consider different viewpoints on the terms “creative thinking†and “creativityâ€, the concept of creativity of primary school pupils. We highlight the main important components of a child’s creativity and creative thinking. This article looks at the creative methods which allow building conditions for student’s communicative interaction and solving communicative problems with the help of creative thinking in English Language Teaching as а foreign language and the benefits and downsides. The main aim of this article is to examine the impact of creative thinking development on improving speaking skills, creative approach to problem solving and expression of ideas of primary school students. Due to the fact that in Kazakhstan there is an artificial language environment in foreign language learning, our experimental research showed that the work at creative thinking at the English lessons can contribute to the development of the ability to think in the target language. It focuses on a particular class (English as а foreign language), at Kazakhstani primary school.
Keywords: creativity; creative thinking, creative activity; creative personality; problem solving method
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Bogoyavlenskaya, D. B (2002). Psihologiya tvorcheskih sposobnostey. Moskva: Akademia .
Bushlinsky, A.V. (1995). K problem subyekta v psihologicheskoi nauke. Gumanisticheskie problem psihologicheskoi teorii (5-14). Moskva: Nauka.
Craft, A. (2011). Creativity and early years education. London: Continuum.
Fromm, E. (1990). Imet ili byt?. Moskva: Progress
Gardner, H. (2006). Changing Minds. The art and science of changing our own and other people’s minds. Boston MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
Guildford, J. (1965). Structural model of intelligence. Psychology of thinking, Moscow: Academia .
Kovalchuk, T. N. (2005). Zanyatie po interesam: razvitie tvorcheskih sposobnostei uchashihsya nazanyatiyah ritoriki. Prakticheskoe posobie dlya uchitelei nachalnyh klassov. Mozyr: Bely Veter.
Kravcova, E. E. (1996). Psihologicheskie problem gotovnosti detey k obucheniyu v shole. Moskva: Academia.
Kunanbayeva, S. S. (2005). Sovremennoe inoyazychnoe obrazovanie: metodologiya i teoriya. Almaty: Edelveis.
Lebedeva, L. D. & Bibikova, N.V. (2004). Kreativnost mladshih shakolnikov: kontekstâ€razvitieâ€. Ulyanovsk.
Maslow, A.G. (1999). Dalniye predely chelovecheskoy psihiki. St. Petersburg: Eurasia.
Newell, A., Shaw, J.C. & Simon, H. A. ( 1962). The processes of creative thinking, in H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell & M. Wertheimer (eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking. New York.
Nick Bozic & Huw Williams (2011). Online problem-based and enquiry-based learning in the training of educational psychologists, Educational Psychology in Practice.
Piaget, J. (2008). Myshlenie I rech. Moskva: Rimis.
Rubinstein, S. L. (2000). Osnovy obshey psihologii. St. Petersburg: Piter.
Sandra J. Altshuler PhD, LCSW & Lois A. Bosch PhD, MSW (2008) Problem Based Learning in Social Work Education, Journal of Teaching in Social Work.
Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R.J., Feldman, D.H., Gardner, H., Nakamura, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Creativity and development. New York: Oxford university press.
Shamshad H. (1988). Creativity, Concept and Findings. Delhi : Motilal Banarsidass Publishers .
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Sternberg, Robert J. (2012). "Chapter 6: The triarchic theory of successful intelligence". In Flanagan, Dawn P.; Harrison, Patti L. (eds.). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (Third ed.). New York (NY): Guilford Press.
Taylor, CW (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity’, in Sternberg, RJ (ed.). The Nature of Creativity (99-124). Cambridge.
Torrance, E. P. (1965). Guiding creative talent (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1962); and Rewarding creative behavior: Experiments in classroom creativity. N. J, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Torrance, E. P. (1965). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. Daedalus: Creativity and Learning. N. J, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2005). Psihologiya razvitiya rebenka. Moskva: Smysl, Eskimo.