Determination of University Student Attitudes Toward Violence
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to determine university student attitudes toward violence with respect to their individual characteristics. The sample group of the study comprised 353 students attending the Department of Child Development and the Department of Nursing at Kirikkale University Faculty of Health Sciences. In the study, the “Adolescents’ Attitudes towards Violence Scale (ATVS)†served as the data collection tool. In data analysis, standard deviation, arithmetic mean, the Mann-Whitney U Test and the Kruskal-Wallis H Test were used. There was statistically significant difference in student attitudes towards violence with respect to age, gender and year at university (p<0.05).More research should be conducted to identify other factors associated with attitudes toward violence than age, gender and year at university.
Keywords: Adolescents’ Attitudes towards Violence Scale; attitudes toward violence; university students
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Borum, R. (2000). Assessing violence risk among youth. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56 (10).
Campbell, R. (2006). Sex differences in airect aggression: What are the psychological mediators? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11 (3).
Cetin, H. (2004). Ogrenci ergenlerin siddete yonelik tutumlari: Yas ve cinsiyete gore bir inceleme. (MA dissertation). Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu, Ankara.
Cetin, H. (2011). The validity and reliability for The Adolescents’ Attitudes Toward Violence Scale. Elementary Education Online, 10 (1). Cowie, H. (2000). Bystanding or standing by: Gender issues in coping with bullying in English schools. Aggressive behavior, 26 (1). Dahlberg, L. L. & Potter, L. B. (2001). Youth violence: Developmental pathways and prevention challenges. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20 (1).
Dogan, S. (2001). Farkli sosyo-ekonomik duzeylere mensup ergenlik cagindaki kiz ve erkeklerin saldirgan davranislariyla ana-baba tutumlari arasindaki iliskiler. (MA dissertation). Kocaeli Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Kocaeli.
Ercan, N. (2009). Evlilikte kadina yonelik fiziksel aiddete iliskin tutumlarin yordayicilari: Celisik duygulu cinsiyetcilik, sistemi mesrulastirma ve dini yonelim. (MA dissertation). ODTU Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Ankara.
Gellman, R.A. & Waack-Delucia, J.L. (2006). Predicting school violence: A comparison of violent and nonviolent male students on attitudes towards violence, exposure level to violence, and PTSD sypmtomatology, Psychology in the Schools, 43 (5).
Gencoglu, C., Kumcagiz, H. & Ersanli, K. (2014). Ergenlerin siddet egilimine etki eden ailevi faktorler. Turkish Studies- International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9 (2).
Guler, N., Uzun, S., Boztas, Z. & Aydogan, S. (2002). Anneleri tarafindan cocuklara uygulanan duygusal ve fiziksel istismar/ ihmal davranisi ve bunu etkileyen faktorler. C.U.Tip Fakultesi Dergisi, 24 (3).
Haskan, O. & Yildirim, I. (2012). Siddet egilimi olceginin gelistirilmesi. Egitim ve Bilim, 37 (163).
Haskan, O. (2009). Ergenlerde siddet egilimi, yalnizlik ve sosyal destek. (MA dissertation). Hacettepe Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Ankara.
Heinrich, L.M. & Gullone, E. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26.
Kaplan, B. (2012). Ergenlerde baglanma ve saldirganlik davranislari arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi. (MA dissertation). Ege Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Izmir.
Kaya, A., Bozaslan, H. & Genc, G. (2012). Universite ogrencilerinin anne-baba tutumlarinin problem cozme becerilerine, sosyal kaygi duzeylerine ve akademik basarilarina etkisi, Dicle Universitesi Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 18.
Kocacik, F. & Caglayandereli, M. (2009). Ailede kadina yonelik siddet: Denizli ili ornegi. Uluslararasi Insan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6 (2).
Kodan-Cetinkaya, S. (2013). Universite ogrencilerinin siddet egilimlerinin ve toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine iliskin tutumlarinin incelenmesi. Nesne, 1 (2).
Krug, E.G., Mercy, A.J., Dahlberg, L.L. & Zwi, A.B. (2002, Oct.). The world report on violence and health. The Lancet, 360 .
Kula, A. (2009). Kocaeli Universitesi 2008–2009 akademik yili 1.ve 6. sinif tip ogrencilerinin evlilikte kadina yonelik siddete iliskin tutumlari (MA dissertation). Kocaeli Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu, Kocaeli.
Ozgur, G., Yorukoglu, G. & Baysan-Arabaci, L. B. (2011). Lise ogrencilerinin siddet algilari, siddet egilim duzeyleri ve etkileyen faktorler. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 2 (2).
WHO, (2013). Violence http://www.who.int/topics/violence/en/
Wolfe, K.A. & Foshee V.A. (2003). Family violence, violence expression styles and adolescent dating violence. Journal of Family Violence. 18 (6).
Zinnur Kilic, E. (2012). Ergenlerde siddet kullanimi: Bireysel ve ailesel etkenler. Noropsikiyatri Arsivi 49