Analyzing Research about Resilience
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explain the characteristics and the direction of resilience studies. In this study, documental survey technique is used. Working groups are English and Turkish studies about resilience that are published and accessible, and National Thesis Center. About 128 studies about resilience published between the years 2005-2015 have been accessed. These studies are analyzed according to the type of the study, method, publishing date, sample group and the other variables. Descriptive analysis is used while analyzing the data. As a result of the research, it was found out that 53 of the studies about resilience were master's theses, 18 of them were doctorate theses and 57 of them were articles. 2 of the studies analyzed were carried out in the experimental method, and 110 of them were carried out in the descriptive method. Besides, it is found out that 11 of the studies are developing and adapting scale, 5 of them are review studies. As a result of the literature review, we see that studies about resilience are mostly carried with descriptive analysis and variables about personality, interpersonal interactions, positive/negative psychological variables and job satisfactions are studied.
Keywords: resilience
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Cicchetti, D. (2010). Resilience under conditions of extreme stress: A multilevel perspective. World Psychiatry, 9 (3), 145-54.
Garmezy, N. (1993). Children in poverty: Resilience despite risk. Psychiatry, 56 (1), 127-136.
Gizir, C. A. (2007). Psikolojik saglamlik, risk faktorleri ve koruyucu faktorler uzerine bir derleme calismasi. Turk Psikolojik Danisma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3 (26), 129- 138.
Gurgan, U. (2006). Grupla psikolojik danismanin universite ogrencilerinin yilmazlik duzeylerine etkisi (Doctoral dissertation). Ankara Universitesi, Ankara.
Hanewald, R. (2011). Reviewing the literature on "at-risk" and resilient children and young people. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (2), 16-29.
Masten, A. S. & Obradovic, J. (2006). Competence and resilience in development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094 (1), 13-27.
Tedeschi, R. G., Park, C. L. & Calhoun, L. G. (1998). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual issues. In R. G. Tedeschi, C. L. Park ve L. G. Calhoun (Eds). Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis ( 99-125). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Terzi, S. (2005). Oznel iyi olmaya iliskin psikolojik dayaniklilik modeli (Doctoral dissertation). Gazi Universitesi, Ankara.
Wright, M. O. D. & Masten, A. S. (2005). Resilience processes in development. In S. Goldstein, B.R. Brooks (Eds.). In Handbook of resilience in children ( 17-37). US: Springer.