Streamline of the teaching methods for enhancing the student motivation at the University
Main Article Content
Abstract
Motivation of human resource is important not only in working area but also for students who are preparing themselves for the future career. This paper therefore focused on students’ motivation and suggests the ways of developing the teaching methods in order to increase their motivation for improve their knowledge and skills. Methodological part of the paper presents the results of the questionnaire survey executed at the University of Žilina. The sample consists of 70 students of the first year of bachelor study program Management. The questionnaire is dedicated to: Factors which motivates the students to fulfil their tasks; the level of students’ skills development before and after the completion of subject; students’ awareness; and detection of weak moments during teaching which offer the opportunity for improvement. Based on survey, the paper reveals weaknesses in teaching and contains proposals and recommendations for streamlining the teaching to enhance students’ motivation and their interest in development of their skills and knowledge. In the application part of this paper, there are suggested methods which are based on theoretical knowledge, questionnaire survey, and own observation and experiences (for example: Increasing students’ awareness on their responsibilities, duties, conditions, evaluation criteria and education program).Â
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Biggs, A. (1991). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 83-87.
Blašková, M. et al. (2015). Motivation and development of the university teachers’ motivational competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116-126. doi: 10.1016.
Blašková, M. & Blaško R. (2011). Decision taking in motivating employees. Human Resources Management & Ergonomics, 5(1), 1-14.
Blašková, M. & Blaško R. (2013). Motivation of university teachers and its connections. Human Resources Management & Ergonomics, 7(), 6-21.
Dornyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press, 117-135. doi:10.1017/S026144480001315X.
Downs, M. (2001). A question of motivation. ELI Teaching: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 30-35.
Fu Rui-ping. (2008). Case study of teachers’ mmotivational comments. Sino-US English Teaching,5(2, Serial 50).
Gardner & Lambert. (1959). Teaching and researching motivation. Beijing: Foreign Language. Teaching and Researching Press.
Gardner, R. C. & MacIntyre, P. D.. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective. Second Language Acquisition, 13(1), 57-72.
Gu P. Y. (1996). Exploring ways to understand learning and improve teaching. TESL Reporter, 34-40.
Keller & Vallerand. (1983). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning.
Klingner, J. K. & Vaughn, S. (2002). The changing roles and responsibilities of an LD specialist. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(1).
Nunan. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Richards, J. C., Schmidt, R., Kendrick, H. & Youngkyu, K. (2003). Longman dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Rogers, C. (1980). A way of being: The process of education and its future. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Shu, D. F. (2005). China needs foreign llanguage teaching theories with Chinese characteristics. Foreign Language World, 6, 2-7.
Slavin, R. E. (2003). Educational psychology: Theory into practice (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Wang, G. & Zhao, H. (2005). On developing study motivation in English language teaching. Sino-US English Teaching, 2(4, Serial 16).
Wang, J. (2008). Stimulating students’ motivation in foreign language teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 6(1, Serial 52).
Weinstein, C. S.(1989). Teacher education students’ perception of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 53-60.
Williams, M. & Burden, R. L. (2000). Psychology for language teachers. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Wlodkowski, R. J. (1997.) Motivation with a mission: Understanding motivation and culture in workshop design. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 76.
Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Xu Zhe. (1997). Communicative language teaching. ELI teaching: A journal of theory and practice, 21-26.
Zhang R. & Liang, F. (2008). Survey of college non-english adult learners’ english learning motivation and its implications. US-China Foreign Language, 6(3, Serial 54).