Application of multicriterial method in decision process of staff selection
Main Article Content
Abstract
Modern, active, even experience-based methods of instruction are among basic prerequisites for quality higher education. Drawing students into the qualification and education process and attributing them with the role of partners in relation to their teachers already became a necessity. For this reason the article focuses on presentation of process and results of the newest educational experiment realized at Faculty of Security Engineering of the University of Žilina, whose aim was to strengthen the vocational skills and competences of students. Method of continual simulation of activities of virtual company has been selected as experimental educational method. Based on analysis, synthesis and generalization of theoretical knowledge of creative educational methods, the methodological part focuses on detailed description of basis, elements and process of applied simulation; selection of new employees in company that provides services in private security has been simulated. Utilizing data and criteria resulting from simulated analysis of work positions, students subsequently worked in the environment of multicriterial decisions, and applied procedures defined for method of analysis of hierarchical processes. Conclusion of the article discusses and summarizes the key findings and defines recommendations, through which the presented simulation method can acquire even higher quality and can become a fully-fledged part of the educational program not only at University of Žilina, but also at other universities that provide education in sphere of security management.Â
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977). L'acteur et le systeme. Paris: Le Seuil.
Dupuy, F. (2004). Sociologie du changement. Paris: Dunod.
MENFP (2008). Loi modifiee du 19 decembre 2008 portant reforme de la formation professionnelle. Luxembourg: Memorial.
MENFP (2011a). Berufsbildung neu gestalten: Entwicklung von modularen und kompetenzorientierten Ausbildungsgangen. Luxembourg: MENFP/SFP.
MENFP (2011b). Recueil des outils pour la reforme a l’usage des enseignants et des formateurs en entreprise. Luxembourg: MENFP/SFP.
MENJE (2015). Projet de loi portant modification 1) de la loi modifiee du 19 decembre 2008 portant reforme de la formation professionnelle, 2) de la loi du 15 Juillet 2011 visant l'acces aux qualifications scolaires et professionnelles des eleves a besoins educatifs particuliers, 3) de l'article L.222-4 du Code du Travail. Luxembourg: MENJE.
Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Noesen, J. (2005). La formation et l’enseignement professionnels au Luxembourg: Une breve description. Luxembourg: Office des publications officielles des Communautes europeennes.
Refernet (2013). Luxembourg: VET in Europe – Country report 2013. Luxembourg: Refernet CEDEFOP.
Tyack, D. & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.