Development and validation of analytic and holistic rubric guides in assessing concept cartoons
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study focuses on the development and validation of a teacher made analytic and holistic rubric guide in assessing Concept Cartoons in teaching science lessons. This study is a descriptive-developmental type of research. In validating and testing the reliability of the developed rubric guides, science teachers and experts, and students from Quezon City Polytechnic University served as respondents. Three analytic and three holistic rubric guides to assess three different forms of Concept Cartoons were developed, used and subjected for validity and reliability test. Results showed that the developed analytic and holistic rubric guides were valid and reliable. In conclusion, valid and reliable analytic and holistic rubric guides are important in giving a conclusive analysis of student’s learning. With the use of valid and reliable rating scales strengthen the claims that concept cartoons help teachers in identifying and correcting students’ misconceptions.
Keywords: Concept cartoon; holistic rubric; analytic rubric; assessment of learning; validity; reliability.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).