Validity of backs tool in assessing low back pain among Nurses in Malaysia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
“Back Apparatus: Collaboration between UKMMC with SOCSO†(BACKS) Tool is a Malay-language questionnaire that was developed to assess work-related chronic low back pain (LBP) in Malaysia. This study provided internal structure evidence of construct validity of BACKS Tool among nurses in Malaysia. A cross-sectional study involving 1290 nurses in six public hospitals in Penang, Malaysia was conducted. Job demands sub-scale consists of two factors namely Physical Demand (5 items) and Psychological Demand (9 items). The data was analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The analysis showed two- and one-factor models fit the data equally good (CFI and TLI>0.9, RMSEA<0.08, SRMR<0.08) with good composite reliability.However, the two-factor model showed poor discrimination between the Physical Demand and Psychological Demand factors
(r=0.944). Although the discrimination could be justified based on the content of the items, it is recommended to consider combining the factors into a single factor in future studies.
Keywords: BACKS Tool; confirmatory factor analysis; internal structure; public hospital nurses; validity.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).