Different political impacts on making of Western-style art and on art education in Turkey

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Feb 19, 2016
Updated: 2016-02-19
Versions:
2016-02-19 (2)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v2i1.274

Main Article Content

Nimet Keser
Çukurova University, Faculty of Education, Department of Fine Art Education, Adana, 01330, Turkey
İnan Keser
Dicle University, Facultyof Literature, Department of Sociology, Campus Diyarbakır, 21280, Turkey

Abstract

It was not possible to mention a Western-style art education and an artistic production of current quantity and style two centuries ago in Turkey. In other words, existing style of art and art education in Turkey has a quite short history. Thus, it is logical to confer that a quick and radical period of change in Turkish art world was experienced within a pretty short time. In this study, putting forth the emergence and development of Western style painting and the education of painting in Turkey with its main lines, it was tried to analyze that how did the process of change affected the actors in the field of art. As a result of this analysis, it was concluded that as the artistic change in the field of painting in Ottoman Empire and in the following Turkish Republic did not arise out of internal dynamics of artistic production field, but from the Westernization desire of the political power, nearly everything about art was in the monopoly of the political power about art for a quiet long time, and there had been no other social stratum supporting and demanding art, the artists had established clientelist relationships with the political power especially till the 1940s and formed a language of painting parallel to the demands of the political power.

Keywords: Sociology of art, Turkish art history,art education, artistic change, Westernisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Keser, N., & Keser, İnan. (2016). Different political impacts on making of Western-style art and on art education in Turkey. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v2i1.274
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Selected Papers of 4th International Conference on Design and Arts (WCDA-2015)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

And, M. (2002). Osmanli tasvir sanatlari 1: Minyatur. Istanbul: İs Bankası.

Arık, R. (1976). Batılılasma donemi anadolu tasvir sanatı. Ankara: Turkiye İs Bankası Kultur.

Arseven, C. E. (1993). Sanat ve siyaset hatıralarım. Istanbul: İletisim.

Ayata, A. G. (1992). CHP (orgut ve Ideoloji). Ankara: Gundogan.

Baskan, S. (1994). Osmanlı Ressamlar Cemiyeti. Ankara: Cagdas.

Berk, N. (5 Ekim 1933). D Grubu. Vakit Gazetesi.

Berk, N. (1937). Turk heykeltırasları. İstanbul: Guzel Sanatlar Akademisi.

Berkes, N. (1973). Turkiye’de cagdaslasma. Ankara: Bilgi.

Cezar, M. (1971). Sanatta Batı’ya acılıs ve Osman Hamdi. Istanbul: Turkiye İs Bankası.

Cezar, M. (1973). Devlet Guzel Sanatlar Akademisi. Istanbul: Renkler.

Cubuk, M. (1977). Guzel Sanatlar Akademisi’nin gelecegi uzerine bir arastırma. Istanbul: Istanbul Devlet Guzel Sanatlar Akademisi.

Dursun, T. (2002). Tek parti donemindeki Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi buyuk kurultayları. Ankara: Turk Tarih Kurumu.

Erol, T. (1984). Gunumuz Turk resminin olusumunda Bedri Rahmi Eyuboglu: Yetisme kosulları, sanatcı kisiligi. Istanbul: Cem.

Gardner, H. (1986). Art through the ages. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Gezer, H. (1984). Cumhuriyet donemi Turk heykeli. Ankara: İs Bankası.

Giray, K. (1997). Mustakil Ressamlar ve Heykeltıraslar Birligi. İstanbul: Akbank Kultur ve Sanat.

Gokalp (2000). Turklesmek, İslamlasmak, muasırlasmak. İstanbul: Bordo Siyah.

Gokalp, Z. (2001). Turkculugun esasları. İstanbul: İnkılap.

Goren, A. K. (1997). Turk resim sanatında Sisli Atolyesi ve Viyana Sergisi. İstanbul: Sisli Belediyesi ve İstanbul Resim Heykel Muzeleri Dernegi.

Gultekin, G. (1992). Batı anlayısına donuk Turk resim sanatı. Ankara: Ziraat Bankası.

İyem, N. (2002). Yeniler ustune. In S. Ozdemir (Ed.), Dunden Yarına Nuri İyem (pp.99-129). Istanbul: Evin Sanat Galerisi.

Kansu, N. A. (1941). Halk terbiyesi ve Halkevleri. Ulku, 97, 3-6.

Kuban, D. (1970). 100 soruda Turkiye sanatı. Istanbul: Gercek.

Oner, S. (1995). Turk resminin gelisiminde sarayın yeri (1839-1923), 9nd International Turkish Arts Congress. İstanbul, Turkey.

Renda, G. (2002). Osmanlı’da heykel. Sanat Dunyamız, 82, 139-147.

Renda, G. & Erol, T. (1980). Baslangıcından bugune cagdas Turk resmi. Istanbul: Tiglat.

Seyhsuvaroglu, H. Y. (1960). Eski Turk sanatları. Istanbul: Varlık.

Tansug, S. (1999). Cagdas Turk sanatı. Istanbul: Remzi.

Toprak, B. (1962). Sanat tarihi. Istanbul: Inkılap and Aka.

Timur, T. (2001). Turk devrimi ve sonrası. Ankara: İmge.

Yetkin, C. (1970). Siyasal iktidar sanata karsı. Ankara: Bilgi.