Determination of odor profile of university students using electroencephalography (EEG)

Main Article Content

Ömür Uçar
Murat Atan

Abstract

Sense of smell, a subjective sensation, has not been studied as much as the other senses hence interpretation of olfactory messages is still not a fully understood process.  Olfactory perception, about which science made some significant advances only in the last 30 years, identifies a chemical substance coming to nose while also remembering past experiences. Therefore, in terms of odor appreciation profile it is important to reveal the difference between individuals as well as societies. The aims of this study are interpretation of EEG data with subjective statements, generation of a common denominator considering the gender variable and determination of odor appreciation profile for the Turkish sample.

In this study, subjects who have no detailed information about the olfaction and odor were selected. EEG measurements were of randomly selected thirty six (eighteen female and eighteen male) right-handed, aged 18-28 years university students. Odor panel consists of 13 pleasant smells from different odor families (orange blossom, jasmine, peach, aldehydes, musk, vanilla, sandalwood, grass, amber, bergamot, pine, rose and patchouli). After examination of participants’ demographic characteristics, subjective statements and EEG data during smelling, The Odor Profile of University Students was provided and suggestions were made related to the conclusions.

 

Keywords: Odor Profile, Electroencephalography (EEG), Odor Appreciation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Uçar, Ömür, & Atan, M. (2016). Determination of odor profile of university students using electroencephalography (EEG). New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v2i1.275
Section
Articles

References

Calkin, R. R., & Jellinek J. S. (1994). Perfumery: practise and principles. (1st ed.) New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication

Diego, M. A., Jones, N. A., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Schanberg, S., Kuhn, C., Mcadam, V., Galamaga R., & Galamaga M. (1998). Aromatherapy positively affects mood, eeg patterns of alertness and math computations. International Journal of Neuroscience, 96, 217-224.

Field, T., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., Cisneros, W., Feijo, L., Vera Y., & Gil K., (2005). Lavender fragrance cleansing gel effects on relaxation. International Journal of Neuroscience, 115, 207-222.

Kolb, B., & Whishaw. I. Q. (2005). An introduction to brain and behaviour (2nd edition). New York: Worth Publishers.

Kose,E., Sarsilmaz M., Ogeturk, M., Kus, I., Kavakli, A., & Zararsiz I. (2007). Role of rose essential oil aroma in learning behaviour: an experimental study. Fırat Medical Journal, 12(3), 159-162.

Lee, K., Kim, D., & Jeong, S., (1994). Effects of fragrance on brain activity. Journal of ergonomics society of Korea, 13(2), 43-48

Lorig, T. (1989). Human EEG and odor response. Prog. Neurobiol, 33, 387, 398.

Lorig, T. (1999). The application of electroencephalographic techniques to the study of human olfaction: a review and tutorial. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36(2000), 91-104.

Masago, R., Matsuda, T., Kikuchi, Y., Miyazaki, Y., Iwanaga, K., Harada, H., & Katsuura, T. (2000). Effects of inhalation of essential oils on eeg activity and sensory evaluation. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, 19(1), 35-42.

Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. P., & Paul, E. S. (2010, August). An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proceedings Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(2010), 2895–2904.

Moncrieff, R.W. (1966). Odour preferences. (1st edition). London, Grampian Press Ltd.

Murakami, H. (2005). Low frequency waves on EEG recordings during stimuli of smells. proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp.2532). Bruno G. Bara et al., NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

Retiveau A.N., (2004). Individual differences and the perception of complex scents. Doctor Of Philosophy Thesis, Food Science Graduate Program, Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas

Sell.C. (2006). Ingredients for the modern perfumery industry, Chapter 4, p52-131. In Sell, C. S. (editor). The Chemistry of Fragrances, From Perfumer to Consumer (2nd edition). Dorset: Royal Society of Chemistry.

Sørensen J. (2008). Measuring emotions in a consumer decision-making Context Approaching or Avoiding. Aalborg University Working Paper Series Department of Business Studies No. 20.

Sugano, H. (1992). Psychophysiological studies of fragrance, Chapter 14. In Van Toller, S. and Dodd, G.H. (Editors) (1992). Fragrance: The Psychology and Biology of Perfume, (1st edition). London: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.

Timofeeva, O.A., & Gordon, C.J. (2001). Changes in EEG powers spectra and behavioral states in rats exposed to acetylcholinesterase inhibitor chlorpyrifos and muscarinic agonist oxotremorine. Brain Research, 893, 165 - 177.

Toller, V., Behan, S., Howells, J., Kendal-Reed, P., & Richardson, M. (1993). An analysis of spontaneous human cortical EEG activity to odours. Chem. Senses, 18, 116.

Weizkrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: a case history and implications. Oxford University Press, Oxford.