Beyond the technological blindfold: a fundamental design research approach to sustainability
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Design for sustainability is contextualised within the modern worldview, which undermines notions of human meaning that accord with sustainability. A fundamental design research approach is presented, which responds to calls for more radical approaches to sustainability that account for deeper notions of human meaning – notions that are lacking within dominant technological approaches. Two artefacts have been designed in response to philosophical perspectives that relate to the technological erosion of human meaning. It is argued that this form of fundamental design research could inform a higher education agenda that substantively contributes towards the development of more effective, rather than merely more efficient approaches to design for sustainability.
Keywords: Design, sustainability, technology, meaning
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Badke, C. & Walker, S. (2013). Design sleepwalking: Critical inquiry in design. In Walker S. & Giard J. (Eds.), The handbook of design for sustainability (pp. 389-407). A&C Black.
Borgmann, A. (1987). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
Braungart, M., & McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things (1st ed.). North Point Press NYC.
Brey, P. (2010). Philosophy of technology after the empirical turn. Techné, 14(1), 36–48.
Buchanan, R. (1998). Education and professional practice in design. Design Issues, 14(2), 63–66.
Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton.
Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy. Earthscan LLC.
Cooper, T. (2013). Sustainability, consumption and the throwaway culture. In Walker S. & Giard J. (Eds.), The handbook of design for sustainability (pp. 137-155). A&C Black.
Curtis, M. (2005). Distraction: Being human in the digital age. Futuretext Limited.
Davison, A. (2001). Technology and the contested meanings of sustainability. State University of New York Press.
Davison, A. (2013). Making sustainability up: Design beyond possibility. In Walker S. & Giard J. (Eds.), The handbook of design for sustainability (pp. 43-56). A&C Black.
Doordan, D.P. (2013). Developing theories for sustainable design. In Walker S. & Giard J. (Eds.), The handbook of design for sustainability (pp. 43-56). A&C Black.
Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. OUP Oxford.
Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2001). Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ehrenfeld, J.R. (2013). The roots of unsustainability. In Walker S. & Giard J. (Eds.), The handbook of design for sustainability (pp. 43-56). A&C Black.
Fallman, D. (2008). The interaction design research triangle of design practice, design studies, and design exploration. Design Issues, 24(3), 4–18.
Fry, T. (2005). The scenario of design. Design Philosophy Papers, (1).
Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design ? In CHI (pp. 937–946). ACM.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought. Harper Colophon Books, New York.
Marchand, A. (2009). Sustainability and design education: From products to practices. Engineering and Product Design Education, (September), 436–440.
Marchand, A., & Walker, S. (2009). Designing in design research : From solving problems to exploring issues. In 8th European Academy Of Design Conference (pp. 300–303).
Postman, N. (2004). The information age: A blessing or a curse? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(2), 3–10.
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J. J. (2005). Reflective design. In 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (pp. 49–58). ACM.
Sheedy, J. (2011). Pondering life: The human brain - Right and left. Retrieved April 14, 2015, from http://www.drsheedy.com/our-2-minds/the-human-brain-right-and-left.php
Swann, C. (2002). Action research and the practice of design. Design Issues, 18(1), 49–61.
Thakara, J. (2001). Design Challenge. Interactions, 46–52. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jasonh/courses/ubicomp-sp2007/papers/08-thackara-design-challenge-pervasive.pdf
Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Walker, S. (2012). The narrow door to sustainability – From practically useful to spiritually useful artefacts. The International Journal of Sustainable Design, 2(1), 83–103.
Walker, S. (2014). Designing Sustainability: Making radical changes in a material world. Routledge.
Walker S. & Giard J. (2013). The handbook of design for sustainability. A&C Black.
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.