The correlation between the reasons for study and reading behaviour among graduate students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed at knowing the reasons for the study of the graduate students, their reading behaviour and the correlation between them. Participants were 135 postgraduate students. Data were collected by using questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results showed the reason for the study of the students got an average mean score close to the strong category with the dominant aspects of career and investment; while reading behaviours fell into a strong category, where dominant aspects based on the type of reading and duration. The coefficient correlation between the two variables was 0.189 and this was a very weak correlation. The findings implied that continuing studies to a higher level is not automatically coupled with better reading behaviour. They may attend the school not for learning but for a piece of certificate as a future invest or career and salary. Therefore, engaging those students in the process of learning is more important.
Keywords: Reasons for study, reading behaviour, graduate students.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).