Medium-term budgetary framework in the EU Member States: study case

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 12, 2016
Updated: 2016-01-12
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v2i2.439

Main Article Content

Tatiana – Camelia Dogaru
National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 30A Expozitiei, Bucharest, 012104, Romania
Adelina Dumitrescu- Peculea
National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 30A Expozitiei, Bucharest, 012104, Romania

Abstract

The current economic crisis has called for huge fiscal efforts to avoid a deflationary spiral. In the context of the crisis, the national fiscal frameworks may play an important role in sustaining budgetary retrenchment. Therefore, the need for a fiscal consolidation, meaning a well-designed fiscal and budgetary policy is a challenge for all EU Member States. Moreover, the importance of strong and resilient fiscal frameworks has been emphasised by the October 2009 Council conclusions on the fiscal exit strategy.  On this premise, the paper discusses what elements and considerations should be taken into account more carefully in designing resilient fiscal frameworks so as to support optimal policy-making and to promote the respect of the Stability and Growth Pact provisions. The unit analysis consists on several EU Member States, affected by economic crisis. Taking into consideration the aim of the paper, the research methodology is based on a case study as research strategy, and uses the triangulation method to obtain confirmation of findings through convergence of different perspective. Regarding the qualitative research, the authors use theoretical framework, legal analyses, systematic and analytical collecting data from official written sources, and macroeconomic indicators for quantitative aspects.

Keywords: budgetary framework, restructuring process, governmental measures and policies.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dogaru, T. – C., & Peculea, A. D.-. (2016). Medium-term budgetary framework in the EU Member States: study case. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v2i2.439
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016): Selected Papers of 4th World Congress Administrative and Political Sciences (ADPOL-2015)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

European Commission. (2010). Current domestic fiscal framework reforms across the EU, in Public Finances in EMU – 2010, European Union Publishing.

European Commission. (2009). Analysis: Medium-term budgetary frameworks in the EU Member States in 2008, European Union Publishing.

European Commission. (2013). Statutory Instruments, no. 508 of 2013 – European Union (Requirements for budgetary frameworks of member states, Regulations.

Lundback, E. J. (2008). Medium-Term Budgetary Frameworks – Lessons for Austria from International Experience. International Monetary Fund, available at https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/wp08163.pdf

Spackman, M. (2002). Multi-Year Perspective in Budgeting and Public Investment Planning, OECD: Paris.

International Federation of Accountants (IFA). (2001). Governance in the Public Sector: A Governing Body Perspective - International Public Sector Study, NY: USA.

European Commission. (2008). Fiscal Rules, Independent Institutions and Medium-term Budgetary Frameworks, European Union, available at http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/fiscal_governance/documents/3-a5a_analysis_en.pdf.

Moisa ALTAR, M., Albu, L.L., Necula, C., Bobeica, G. (2009). Public Finances: Introduction of a Medium-term Budgetary Framework, European Institute of Romania.

European Commission. (2007). Analysis: Medium-term budgetary frameworks in the EU Member States in 2006 (Part III of the Report on "Public finances in EMU - 2007 in How to stick to medium-term budgetary plans, European Union available at http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/fiscal_governance/documents/3-a4_analysis_pfr_2007_part_iii_en.pdf

European Commission. (2011). Directive (2011/85/EU of 8 November 2011 on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States.

Batusaru, C., Otetea, A., Banu, I. (2014).The Importance of aMedium-Term Budgetary Framework in Enhancing the Sustainability of Public Finances in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance 16, pp. 270 -274.

European Commission, Fiscal governance, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/fiscal_governance/framework/index_en.htm

Debrun, X., L., Moulin, A., Turrini, J., Ayuso-i-Casals, Kumar, M. S. (2008). Tied to the Mast? National Fiscal Rules in the European Union, Economic Policy, pp. 299–362.

Government of Romania, 2014, Fiscal and Budgetary Strategy for 2015-2017, available at http://discutii.mfinante.ro/static/10/Mfp/transparenta/EN_SFB2015_2017.pdf