Aims and Scope

Current Proceedings on Technology seeks to encourage research and scholarly written proceedings about any aspect of current issues in technology Current Proceedings on Technology is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal on technology and devoted to be a joint platform for presenting and discussing the emerging developments on technology in an international arena. The aim of the journal is to publish proceedings to contribute to the development of technology field.

The journal will publish selected papers from conference proceedings with an emphasis in applied technology disciplines, for example software and information technology. Conferences should be relevant to an international audience, with a focused theme and cover timely topics. Conference proceedings are accepted for publication in based on suitability of scope and are required to meet certain criteria, including the assurance that all papers are original, will be subject to peer review and will not be published elsewhere.

 

Conference proceedings are accepted for publication in Current Proceedings on Technology based on quality and therefore papers are required to meet certain criteria, including quality of the conference, relevance to an international audience and covering highly cited or current topics. Current Proceedings on Technology will cover proceedings in all topics of technology-related disciplines incorporating the fields of Computer Science, Information Technology, Engineering, Nano-technology, biomedical, Educational Technology and etc.

 

The journal is indexed in prestigious databases worldwide such as Google Scholar, Asian Education Index, InfoBase Index, International Institute of Organized Research (I2OR) and Scientific Indexing Service (SIS).

 

In addition, the published issues submitted to SCOPUS and Thomson Reuters Conference Proceedings Citation Index – CPCI (ISI Web of Science) for evaluation for inclusion in the list.

 

Copyright aims to protect the specific way the conference proceeding has been written to describe a scientific research in detail. It is claimed that this is necessary in order to protect author's rights, and to regulate permissions for reprints or other use of the published research. Current Proceedings on Technologyhave a copyright form which is required authors to sign over all of the rights when their manuscript is ready for publication.

 

Current Proceedings on Technology offers a single, highly recognized platform where conference papers can be hosted and accessed by millions of researchers worldwide. Researchers have the opportunity to access conference papers related with their fields easily.  

 

All proceedings appear online within 10 weeks of acceptance of the final manuscripts via the conference organizer and are freely available to all users.

 

To ensure discoverability and citability the final forms of online papers are individually metadated, XML versions are optimized for search engines, references are linked and DOI (Digital Object Identifier) numbers are added through CrossRef.

ISSN: 2547-8788

 

 

Owner and Publisher

Birlesik Dunya Yenilik Arastirma ve Yayincilik Merkezi

Registration: SLBT 375, Free Port, Famagusta, (North) Cyprus

Address: Sehit Ilmiye Sokak No: 9/2, Ortakoy, Nicosia, 2681, Cyprus

Director: Mehmet Cemal Uzunboylu

Tel: +90 392 223 16 67

E-mail: info@un-pub.eu

https://www.un-pub.eu/publisher/

 

Sponsor
Current Proceedings on Technology (P-ITCS) is an academic journal that is sponsored by Near East University.

Frequency
Irregular

 

Publication Ethics
P-ITCS

requires all authors to adhere to the ethical standards as prescribed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which take privacy issues seriously and is committed to protecting your personal information.

 

Publication Policy
P-ITCS strongly encourages the publication of research worldwide to provide freely available and downloadable online publications and peer reviewed research. In order to achieve this aim, P-ITCS develops and follows general policies to help authors and researchers and clarify our position on key issues. It is a general principle that the editor of the journal is entirely and independently responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published or not. In making this decision, the editor must follow the policies of the journal's editorial board.

 

P-ITCS publishing policies include:

1. Accessibility

 P-ITCS consistently and proactively endeavors to make publications fully accessible to all users. P-ITCS provides open access (OA) articles that are available online to the readers without any financial, legal, or technical requirements or sanctions and is committed to providing long-term, sustainable access to qualified scientific research for everyone.

2. Originality

All authors and researchers must adhere to publication requirements in which submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere in any language before. Work should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication.

3. Authorship

The authorship of research publications should accurately state individual contributions to the work. The list of authors should accurately reflect who carried out the research and who wrote the article. For collaborative research, who has done what and who takes responsibility for the conduct and validity should be clearly indicated to readers.

4. Misconduct and redundant publication

In cases of suspected or alleged research misconduct, P-ITCS follows the COPE standards. If substantial amount of evidence of misconduct is found, some steps to correct the scientific record, which may include issuing a correction, retraction or withdrawal of the publication are followed. Research misconduct includes fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them. Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.

 

If you have any concerns about potential misconduct, please email the journal. Address correspondence to the journal's Editor-in-Chief, Chief Editor, or Editorial Director as appropriate. If misconduct is suspected, journal editors will act in accordance with the relevant COPE guidelines.

5. Article Retraction and Withdrawal

In cases of intrusion of professional ethical codes and principles such as multiple submission, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data; articles might be retracted from P-ITCS follows the COPE standards database.

6. Confidentiality

Editors should critically evaluate any potential intrusion of data protection and participant confidentiality. This includes requiring properly informed consent for the actual research presented, consent for publication where applicable and having editorial policies that comply with guidelines on participant confidentiality.

 

Peer Review Process
The practice of peer review is to ensure that good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of P-ITCS and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.

During review process we use iThenticate or Turnitin plagiarism software. So, it is recommended that authors should scan with iThenticate or Turnitin plagiarism or other free plagiarism software of their manuscripts. 

Initial manuscript evaluation
The Editors first evaluate all manuscripts. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review.
Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt.

Type of Peer Review
This journal employs double blind reviewing, where both the referee and author remain anonymous throughout the process.

How the referee is selected
Referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for referees from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used.

 

 

How long does the review process take?
Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 2 months. Should the referees' reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed a further expert opinion will be sought. All our referees sign a conflict of interest statement. Revised manuscripts are usually returned to the initial referees within 2 weeks. Referees may request more than one revision of a manuscript.

Final report
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees.

The Editors' Decision is final
Referees suggest the Editors, who are responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. It is obligatory for the researches to keep the data for 5 years. Due to our publishing policies, from time to time some of the data and analysis output may be requested from the authors.

Documents to be Sent After Acceptance

1) Final version of the accepted article prepared according to the P-ITCS Template
2) Official Proofreading Certificate
3) The Similarity (Turnitin or iTenticate) Report is not more than %10. 

 

Contact

CPOT

STMP: +90 392 223 16 67

Address: Sehit Ilmiye Sokak No: 9/2, Ortakoy, North Nicosia, 2681, Cyprus

E-mail: gjt.editor@sproc.org 
Thttp://www.cpot.eu/