Model parameters to helping women in crisis pregnancy: Specialists’ view
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although abortion is often declared as the right of choice that belongs only to the pregnant woman, it is important to emphasize the significance of the free and informed consent. Lithuania has no systematical help provided for women undergoing crisis pregnancy. The aim of the research is to find bases for model parameters for such kind of help. The qualitative research consists of six individual half structured interviews. In order to receive data that is objective and reflects different sides of the problem the interviews were carried out with obstetrician gynecologists and psychologists working with women in crisis pregnancy. The data received during the interviews has revealed a various needs for help: To be consulted by an obstetrician gynecologist, a psychologist, a social worker, a priest, an embryologist, a lawyer, a psychiatrist, an oncologist and a specialist in infertility issues. Besides, the research has revealed the need of consultations for both parents of the unborn.
Â
Keywords: crisis pregnancy; counseling; abortion; psychologist; obstetrician gynecologistDownloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Gruodyte, E. (2012). Aborto teisinio reglamentavimo aspektai Europos Zmogaus Teisiu Teismo jurisprudencijos kontekste. Jurisprudencija, 19(2), 739–752.
Gvaldaite, L. & Bordun, J. (2013). Abortas kaip socialine problema: prevencijos poreikio aspektas. Tiltai, 1, 147–167.
International Planned Parenthood Federation (2012). Abortion Legislation in Europe. Prieiga internetu: http://www.ippfen.org/sites/default/files/Final_Abortion%20legislation_September2012.pdf [ziUreta 2014 10 17].
O‘Keeffe, S. (2012). Crisis pregnancy and pregnancy secision making. An outline of influencing factors. Ireland. Crisis Pregnancy Agency Report No.1. 2004. // http://crisispregnancy.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/1.-crisis-pregnancy-and-pregnancy-decision-making-an-outline-of-influncing-factors.pdf. ZiUreta 2015-07-23.
Obeleniene, B. (2005). Moters apsisprendimą nutraukti nestumą lemiantys veiksniai. Nestumo nutraukimo etika, 8–19.
Picchioni, A. & Barnhart, J. (1998). The abortion question and pastoral counseling. Americal Journal of Pastoral Counseling, 1(2), 3–21.
Project on the order of termination of pregnancy (2014). Retrieved from http://www.lrs.lt/pls/proj/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=247938&p_org=10&p_fix=y
Project on the Protection of Life in Prenatal Phase (2013). Retrieved from http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=444122&p_tr2=2
Rudaleviciene P. (2012). Nestumo nutraukimas ir psichikos sveikata. Medicina, etika ir teise apie zmogu iki gimimo, 112–140.
Sereno, S., Leal, I. & Maroco, J. (2013). The role of psychological adjustment in the decision-making process for voluntary termination of pregnancy. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility, 14(3), 143–151.
Stolygaite, A., GrigaliUniene, V. & Steponavicene, G. (2009). Psichologiniai nestumo nutrUkimo aspektai. Lietuvos bendrosios praktikos gydytojas, 13(9), 538–542.
Suter, S. M. (2013). The politics of information: Informed consent in abortion and end-of-life decision making. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 39(1), 7–61.
Turner Richardson, Ch., & Nash, E. (2006). Misinformed consent: The medical accuracy of state-developed abortion counseling materials. Guttmacher Policy Review, 9(4): 6–11.
Vareikyte, A. (2015). Pagalbos moterims krizinio nestumo metu modelio parametrai (Master thesis).