Comparing Attitudes towards Violence among Adolescents Who are Victims or Non-Victims of Violence
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study has been conducted to compare attitudes towards violence among adolescents who are victims or non-victims of violence. In addition, this current study examines how attitudes towards violence vary according to gender, perpetrator group of violence, type of violence and immigration case. For data collection, Personal Information Form and Attitude towards Violence Scale were used. The research sample composed of 680 middle school students at 8th grade level. In the analysis phase of the study; Mann-Whitney U. and Kruskal Wallis H. tests were utilized. According to the results, attitudes toward violence vary depending on exposure to violence, gender, perpetrator group of violence and immigration case. However, victims’ attitudes towards violence do not vary depending on type of violence. It can be said that the students who are exposed to violence at school or in their family normalize the violence and see the violence as a problem-solving way in daily life.
Keywords: violence; victim of violence; attitude towards violence;
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Atkinson, R. L, Atkinson, R.C. ,Smith, E. E., Bem, D.J. & Hoeksema, S. N. (2010). Psikolojiye giris (5.Baski). (Y.Alogon, Cev.). Ankara: Ayrinti Basim Evi.
Akman, S. (2013). Lise ogrencilerinin siddete yonelik tutumlari ile okula baglilik duygusu arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi (MA Dissertation). Fatih Universitesi. Ä°stanbul.
Arkonac, S.A. (1998). Sosyal psikoloji. Istanbul: Alfa Basim Yayin. Ayan, S. (2007). Aile icinde siddete ugrayan cocuklarin saldirganlik egilimleri, Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 8 (3), 206-214.
Balkis, M., Duru, E. & Bulus, M. (2005). Siddete yonelik tutumlarin ozyeterlilik, medya, siddete yonelik inanc, arkadas grubu ve okula baglilik duygusu ile iliskisi. Ege Egitim Dergisi, 6 (2), 81-97.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Prentice-Hall. Buluc, B. (2006). Okullarda suc ve siddet. Okullarda siddet ve cocuk suclulugu Egitim ve Siddet, Arastirma Inceleme Serisi, Hegem Yayinlari, Ankara. Buyukozturk, S. (2009). Sosyal bilimler icin veri analizi el kitabi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayinlari. Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Understanding the predictors of violent adolescent behavior. Usa Today-New York-, 130, 48-49.
Delice M. & Yasar, M. (2014). Goc ve siddet suclari iliskisinin incelenmesi Retrieved from on 07.03.2016
Edmonson, H. & Bullock, L. (1998). Youth with aggressive and violent behaviors: Pieces of a puzzle. Preventing School Failure, 42(3), 135-141.
Freedman, J. J. (1989). ‘Cinsiyet rolleri’. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi 22 (2). Bozkurt, K. O. C. (2014). Kisilerarasi iliski tarzlarinin saldirganlik ile iliskisi. Uluslararasi Turkce Edebiyat Kultur Egitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 3 (4), 160-182.
Korkut F. (2007). Okul temelli onleyici Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danisma. (2.Baski). Ankara: Ani Yayincilik. Meyer, A. L. & Farrell, A. D. (1998). Social skills training to promote resilience in urban sixth-grade students: One product of an action research strategy to prevent youth violence in high-risk environments. Education and Treatment of Children, 461-488.
Milli Egitim Bakanligi, (2008). Ogrencilerin siddet algisi. Ankara.
Ozgur, G., Yorukoglu, G. & Baysan-Arabaci, L. (2011). Lise ogrencilerinin siddet algilari, siddet egilim duzeyleri ve etkileyen faktorler. Psikiyatri Hemsireligi Dergisi, 2 (2), 53-60.
Polat, O. (2001). Cocuk ve siddet. Ä°stanbul: Der Yayinevi. Sezer, A., Kolac, N. & Erol, S. (2013). Bir ilkogretim okulu 4, 5, Ve 6. sinif ogrencilerinin saldirganlik duzeylerinin anne baba tutumlari ve bazi degiskenler ile iliskisi.
Siyez, M.D. (2010). Ergenlerde problem davranislar. (2). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Slovak, K., Carlson, K. & Helm, L. (2007). The influence of family violence on youth attitudes. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24 (1), 77-99. The United Nations Children's Emergency Fund. (2008). Turkiye’de etkili anne babalik egitimi uzerine, bilgi-tutum-beceri arastirmasi. Kantitatif sonuclar taslak rapor. RFP TURA/2008/07. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org.tr/files/bilgimerkezi/doc/unicef-kap-midline-survey-taslak-rapor-kantitatif-r01-05.12.08-4.pdf on 07.3.2016. The.United.Nations.Children's.Emergency.Fund. (2011). Turkiye’de cocuklarin durumu raporu
Retrieved from http://abdigm.meb.gov.tr/projeler/ois/egitim/032.pdf on 07.03.2016. Unalmis, M. (2010). Lise 1. sinif ogrencilerinin zorba/kurban davranislari ile sosyal beceri ve siddete yonelik tutumlari (MA Dissertation). Gazi Osman Pasa Universitesi, Tokat.
Verlinden, Stephanie, Michel Hersen, & Jay Thomas (2000). Risk factors in school shootings. Clinical Psychology Review 20 (1), 3-56.
World Health Organization, (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, 1-46. Yorukoglu, A. (1996). Genclik cagi: Ruh sagligi ve ruhsal sorunlari. Ozgur