Primary School Teachers’ and Teacher Candidates’ Attribituons Toward Students with Dyslexia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examined patterns in teachers' attributional responses to dyslexia. Teachers from elementary schools in Turkey (n=32) and preschool teacher candidates from a state university (n=32) participated in the study. Using written vignettes, four hypothetical male students were described, of two identified with dyslexia, and the other two had no dyslexia. Teachers were to assume each child had just taken a typical classroom writing assessment and failed to write correctly. Four categories of teacher responses were examined: reward or punishment (RP), anger (A), pity (P), and future expectations (FE). Patterns of significant difference in teachers’ and teacher candidates’ responses were not found. Attributional characteristics of elementary teachers and preschool teacher candidates’ responses are discussed.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Biagi, S. (2013). An Introduction to Mass Media, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Boston, USA, 2013.
Bonnange, Claude, Thomas, Chantal, Don Juan sau Pavlov? Eseu despre publicitate, Editura Comunicare.ro, Bucuresti, 2010.
Condry, J. (2010). The Psychology of Television, Lawrence Press, New York, 2010.
Cronin, Anne, M. (2004). Advertising Myths, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London, 2004.
Goddard, A. (2002). Limbajul publicitatii, Editura Polirom, Iasi, 2002.
Green, J. (2011). Advertising, The Rosen Publishing Group, 2011.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality, New York, Harper and Row, 1970.
Mattelart, A. & Mattelart M. (2001). Istoria teoriilor comunicarii, Editura Polirom, Iasi, 2001.
Miroiu, M. (1995). Gandul umbrei. Abordari feministe in filosafia contemporana, Editura Alternative, Bucuresti, 1995.
Ovilvy, D. (1999). Ogilvy on Advertising, Prion Works, Perren Street, New York, USA, 1999.
Petre, D. & Nicola, M. (2004). Introducere in publicitate, Editura Comunicare.ro, Bucuresti, 2004.
Popescu, C. (2005). Bazele publicitatii, support de curs ID, Facultatea de Comunicare si Relatii Publice, Universitatea din Bucuresti, Editura Universitatii Bucuresti, 2005.
Reboul, A. & Moeschler, J. (2001). Pragmatica azi. O noua stiinta a comunicarii, Editura Ehinox, Cluj, 2001, traducere Liana Pop.
Salavastru, C. (2003). Teoria si practica argumentarii, Editura Polirom, Iasi, 2003.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1969.
Sorrentino, M. (2014). Creative Advertising, Ed. Lawrence King Publishing, 2014.
Sutherland, M. & Sylvester, A. K. (2008). De la publicitate la consummator, Editura Polirom, Collegium, Bucuresti, 2008, traducere de Aurelia Anca Vasile.
Taplin, W. (2013). Advertising, Eds. Taylor&Francis Ltd, 2013
Todoran, D. (2004). Psihologia reclamei. Studiu de psihologie economica, Editura Tritonic, Bucuresti, 2004.
White, R. (2014). Advertising, McGraw Hill Publishing Company, Cambridge, Cambridge; 2014