Primary School Teachers’ and Teacher Candidates’ Attribituons Toward Students with Dyslexia

Article Sidebar

Published: Mar 22, 2017
Updated: 2017-03-22
Versions:
2017-03-22 (1)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v3i2.1602

Main Article Content

Nermin Eroglu
Bogazici University, Istanbul University, Turkey
Melek Bahat
Bogazici University, Istanbul University, Turkey
Aysegul Metindogan
Bogazici University, Istanbul University, Turkey

Abstract

This study examined patterns in teachers' attributional responses to dyslexia. Teachers from elementary schools in Turkey (n=32) and preschool teacher candidates from a state university (n=32) participated in the study. Using written vignettes, four hypothetical male students were described, of two identified with dyslexia, and the other two had no dyslexia. Teachers were to assume each child had just taken a typical classroom writing assessment and failed to write correctly. Four categories of teacher responses were examined: reward or punishment (RP), anger (A), pity (P), and future expectations (FE). Patterns of significant difference in teachers’ and teacher candidates’ responses were not found. Attributional characteristics of elementary teachers and preschool teacher candidates’ responses are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Eroglu, N., Bahat, M., & Metindogan, A. (2017). Primary School Teachers’ and Teacher Candidates’ Attribituons Toward Students with Dyslexia. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v3i2.1602
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Selected Papers of 7th World Conference on Psychology, Counselling and Guidance (WCPCG 2016)
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Barros, S. S., & Elia, M. F. (1998). Physics teachers attitudes: How do they affect the reality of the classroom and models for change connecting research in physics education with teacher education.
Clark, M. D. (1997). Teacher response to learning disability a test of attributional principles. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 69-79.
Clark, M. D.,&Artiles, A. J. (2000). A cross-national study of teachers' attributional patterns. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 77-89.
Doyran, F. & Canca, Ä°. (2013). Are they problem learners or students with learning disabilities? What do teachers know about LD?. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(4), 371-389.
Hallahan, D.P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2012). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education. New Jersey: Pearson.
Heider, F.( 1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Weiner, B.,& Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(1), 1.