Investigating of the subjective well-being of gifted adolescents
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
As highly gifted adolescents both maintain their personal development salubriously while coping with the differences caused by being highly gifted and adapt to quick changes in every field of teenage life, they are thought to be a group that has to be specially emphasized. This study aims to analyze the subjective well-being in terms of giftedness, gender and age. The participants of the study consisted of 80 students studying in the 5-6-7-8th grades of secondary schools in Ankara. 32 of the students were diagnosed as gifted while 48 of them were in the regular group. Data was collected using a personal detail form and Adolescent Subjective Well Being Scale. The research is a descriptive study in a survey model. The data was analyzed by using Pearson Correlation Coefficient, t-test and ANOVA. It has been found that the points of subjective wellbeing of the normal group and gifted children group (supported and unsupported) have differentiated. Both of the gifted groups have considerably high levels of subjective well-being comparing with the normal group.
Keywords: Subjective well-being, giftedness, adolescents.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).