Comparison between students’ and instructors’ perceived use and effectiveness of online social technologies
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the massive growth in internet user numbers, the use of social technologies has also grown over the past decade and it has changed the way people conduct their business and studies. Today, online social technologies have become part of education which are mainly used to improve learning experiences and facilitate communication between students and instructors. Therefore, instructors consider integrating social technologies such as Facebook and synchronous communication channels in their educational activities based on the fact that students spend lots of time on such social technologies. However, perceived use of social technologies of students and instructors as well as their aims of using them might be different. This study compares students’ and instructors’ perceived use and effectiveness of online social technologies to fully comprehend the viability of online social technologies in universities. Independent-sample t-test is applied to data collected from 370 students and 106 instructors to find the similarities and differences in perceptions and effectiveness between students and instructors.
Keywords: Online social technologies, social media, higher education, student perceptions, instructor perceptions.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).