Computer aided design in education and its interpretation through design thinking

Main Article Content

Abdullah Togay
Merve Coşkun
Serkan Güneş
Çiğdem Güneş

Abstract

The notion of “design thinking†can be regarded as a way of thinking that consists of both divergent and convergent phases. As a creative problem solving methodology, it first defines the problem with a human-centered perspective and then analyzes all the aspects of the problem as a part of a whole. This approach can be applied in all fields, including design education. With the emerging technology, computer-aided design tools and techniques have become an indispensable part of design professions, and therefore education. However, the way how computer-aided design tools and techniques should be integrated into current design education has not been discussed adequately. This study aims to frame the problems related to the current content, structure and timing of CAD courses. The alternative solutions regarding the integration of CAD courses to product design education will be proposed by using design thinking method.

Keywords: design thinking, computer aided design (CAD), design education

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Togay, A., Coşkun, M., Güneş, S., & Güneş, Çiğdem. (2016). Computer aided design in education and its interpretation through design thinking. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v2i1.315
Section
Articles

References

Şen, Z. (2006). Batmayan güneşlerimiz. Altınburç Publishing, ISBN: 9759093073.

Ertaç, O. (2003). “The influence of technological improvements to the formation of interior spaceâ€, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mimar Sinan University, TURKEY.

Robertson, B. F., Walther, J. & Radcliffe, D. F. (2007). Creativity and the use of CAD tools: lessons for engineering design education from industry, ASME. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(7), 753-760.

Cross, Nigel. (2011). Design thinking: understanding how designers think and work. Berg.

Küçükerman, Ö. (1996). Endüstri tasarımı, endüstri için ürün tasarımında yaratıcılık, Yem Publishing, İstanbul.

Göker, H.A. (1995). Bilim, teknoloji, sanayi üçlemesi ve Türkiye üzerine söyleşiler, Sarmal Publishing.

Kuo, C. & MacCallum, KJ. (1984). Computer aided applications in ship technology. Computers in Industry, 5(3), 211-219.

Khosrowjerdi, M., Kinzel, G. L., & Rosen, D. W. (2005). Computers in education: activities, contributions, and future trends. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 5(3), 257-263.

Hiekataa, K., Yamatob, H., & Rojanakamolsanb, P. (2008). Collaborative product and service life cycle management for a sustainable world Advanced Concurrent Engineering, CAD Education Support System Based on Workflow, (pp 461-468), Berlin: Springer.

Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence: unleashing the creative potential within Us all. NewYork: Drown Business.

Dorst, K. (2010). The nature of design thinking. In Proceedings of the 8th DTR Symposium. Sydney.

Brown, T. & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation, Development Outreach, 12(1), 29-43.

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.

Dunne, D. & Roge, M. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: an interview and discussion, Academic Management Learning Education, 5(4), 512-523.

Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking, Design and Culture, 3(3), 285-306.

Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education, Design Studies, 25(1), 63–91.

Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Weinberg, U. (2009). Design thinking, Mv-verlag, Munich.