Cultural patterns of shoe storage in the apartment life of Ä°stanbul, a focus on the differences of shoe case usages
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to reflect an ethnographic research on the usages of shoe cases in the apartment life of Ä°stanbul. This topic is chosen to understand the effect of a cultural behaviour on taking off the shoes before entering a private place. This common cultural behaviour may have role on changing the design of shoe case, its variations developed by users and its artefacts. To do this research, I followed interviewing and literature review methods. Initially, I met people to talk about their habits on taking off the shoes and then I searched for the literature within the relation of common spaces in neighbourhood. The reason I followed that way is not to have some preconceptions though the literature before I conducted interviews. As a conclusion, paper inquiries the concept of borders, hygiene, and common place through the changing usages of a shoe case and through the habit of taking off the shoes.
Keywords: Shoe case, apartment life, borders, hygiene, common place
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Ayata, S., & Ayata A.G. (1996). Konut, Komşuluk ve Kent Kültürü. Ankara : T.C.Başbakanlık Toplu Konut İdaresi Başkanlığı.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faroqhi, Suraiya. (1998). Osmanlı Kültürü ve Gündelik Yaşam: Ortaçağdan Yirminci Yüzyıla. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı.
Migdal, J. S. (1997). “Olgu ve Kurgunun BuluÅŸma Zeminiâ€, (eds) S. BozdoÄŸan ve R. Kasaba in Türkiye’de UlusallaÅŸma ve Modern Kimlik. Ä°stanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
Özyegin, G. (2003). “Kapıcılar, Gündelikçiler ve Ev Sahipleri: Türk Kent YaÅŸamında Sorunlu KarşılaÅŸmalarâ€, (der) Deniz Kandiyoti, Ayse Saktanber in Kultur Fragmanlari/ Turkiye’de Gundelik Hayat. Ä°stanbul: Metis.
Taylor, C. (1999). “Two Theories of Modernity.†Public Culture: Society for Transnational Cultural Studies. Millenial Quartet, Volume 1: Alter/Native Modernities. Guest Ed. Dilip Parameshwar Goankar. Duke University Press.