Effects of webquest on the achievement and motivation of Jordanian University students of (independent & dependent) cognitive style

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Webquest on the Jordanian students of different cognitive style. The independent variables were the instruction (conventional & Webquest). The dependent variables were the students’ achievement and motivation. The instruction rating variable is cognitive style (independent & dependent). The study sample consisted of 72 undergraduate educational technology students, information and communication technology students and graphic design students. Inferential statistics were conducted to analyze the data. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and T-TEST was carried out to examine the main effects of the independent variables on the dependent variables. The findings of this study showed that students using the Webquest instruction performed significantly better in achievement and motivation than students using the conventional instruction. Independent cognitive style students performed significantly better in achievement and motivation than dependent cognitive style students. Webquest instruction was found to help students with dependent cognitive style in achievement and motivation.

 Keywords: webquest, cognitive style, achievement, motivation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Effects of webquest on the achievement and motivation of Jordanian University students of (independent & dependent) cognitive style. (2015). World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 7(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v7i2.44
Section
Articles

References

Ahranjani, A. K., & Shadi, M. (2012). Input enhancement and EFL learners’collocation acquisition. Interantional Journal of Academic Research, 4(1), 96-101.

Akbari, R. (1995). The role of language-specific collocations on the written production of intermediate Iranian students learning English as a foreign language. Unpublished MA thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.

Baker, M. (1992). In other words: A coursebook on translation. Kentucky: Routledge.

Benson, M., Benson, E. & Ilson, R. (eds.). (1997). The BBI dictionary of English word combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Chan, S. (2008). Buildings Department Warns of High Winds. The New York Times, June 16,

Crystal, D. (2005). How language works. New York: Overlook Press.

Crystal, D. (1997). In, M. A. Locher & S. L. Graham. (2010). (Ed.). Interpersonal pragmatics. New York: Walter de Gruyter Publication.

Dweik, S. B. & Shakra, A. M. (2011). Problems in translating collocations in religious texts from Arabic into English. The Linguistics Journal. 5, (1), 5-41.

Ellis, N. C. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition: Word structure, collocation, grammar, and meaning. In M. McCarthy & N. Schmidt (Eds.) (1997), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 122-139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Evert, S. (2004). The statistics of word cooccurrences word pairs and collocations. Unpublished Ph.D thesis. Von der Philosophisch-Historischen Fakultät der Universität Stuttgart zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) genehmigte Abhandlung,Farrokh, P. &

Mahmoodzadeh, K. (2012). Iranian learners’ knowledge of English grammatical collocations of gerund. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(11), 11834-11844.

Firth, J. R. (1968). Selected papers of J.R. Firth, 1952-59. Edited by F. R. Palmer. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Firth, J. R. (1968). A synopsis of linguistic theory. In Palmer, F.R. (ed.) Selected Papers of J.R. Firth 1952-59 (168-205). London: Longmans.

Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics (1934-1951). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goudarzi, Z., & Moini, M. R. (2012). The effect of input enhancement of collocations in reading on collocation learning and retention of EFL learners. International Education Studies, 5(3), 247-258.

Grimly, S. Patrol, K.M. (2002). In H.T. Giang. (2010). A study on the pragmatic features of collocation used in advertising hair care products in English and Vietnamese. Unpublished MA thesis. Ministry of Education and Training: University of Danang. Received from: tailieuso.udn.vn/bitstream/TTHL_125/1379/2/Summary.pdf‎

Halliday, M. (1966). Lexis as a linguistic level. In C. E. Bazell et al. (Eds.), In Memory of J. R. Firth. 148-162.

Heine, B., Claudi, U & Hünnemeyer, F. (2001). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. UAS: University of Chicago Press.

Honey, J. (1997). Language is power: The story of standard English and its enemies. Faber & Faber.

Koosha, M., & Jafarpour, A. (2006). Datadriven learning and teaching collocation of prepositions: The case of Iranian EFL adult learners. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 192-209.

Kranz, D. (1997). ‘Review of Michael Lewis’ book ‘Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice’, Hove UK: Language Teaching Publications’, in: TESL-EJ, 3(1).

Kuo, C. L. (2009). An analysis of the use of collocation by intermediate EFL college students in Taiwan. Arecls, 6, 141-155.

Lewis, M. (2000).Teaching collocation: Further development in lexical approach. England: The Language Teaching Publication, LTP.

Lewis, M. (Ed.), (2000). There is nothing as practical as a good theory. In teaching collocations: Further developments in the lexical approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

Lewis, M. (1997).Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. United Kingdom: Heinle.

Lewis, M. (1993).The lexical approach. England: The Language Teaching Publication, LTP.

Lin, Y. (2009). Enhancing EFL learners’ English reading proficiency through collocation instruction. English Teaching & Learning, 33(1), 37-71.

Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: CUP.

McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.

Moon, R. (2001). Vocabulary connections: Multi-word items in English. In Schmitt and McCarthy J. Options for vocabulary learning through communication tasks. ELT Journal, 55(1).

Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: OUP.

Nofal, K. H. (2012). Collocations in English and Arabic: A comparative study. English Language and Literature Studies; 2, (3), p.80.

Nordquist, N. (2013). Collocation. Received from: http://grammar.about.com/od/c/g/collocationterm.htm.

Paciorek, A. & Williams, J. (2013). Semantic implicit learning in language. CogSci Proceedings. Received from: http://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2013/index.html.

Paradis, M. (2004). A Nero-linguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Pirmoradian, M. & Tabatabei, O. (2012). The enhancement of lexical collocation learning through concordanceing: A case of Iranian EFL learners. MJAL 4: 4.

Robins, R. (1964). General linguistics: An introductory survey. Longman. Sadeghi, K. & Panahifar, F. (2013). A corpus-based analysis of collocational errors in the Iranian EFL learners' oral production. The

Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 4(4), 53-78.

Sadoughvanini, S.H. (2012). The relationship between use of collocations and expressiveness: Fulfilling the referential function of language. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies 1(2), 28-37.

Sinclair, J. M. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Yousefi, O. M. & Pustch, S., & Salehipour, S. (2012). The effect of pre-teaching vocabulary and collocations on the writing development of advanced students. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 2(5). May 2012, 86- 103. Received from:www.academians.org

Zarei, A. (2002). Patterns of Iranian advanced learners problems with English collocations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Isfahan, Iran.