Flipped classroom: A review of recent literature

Main Article Content

Abstract

The use of learning technologies, especially multimedia provide varied facilities for students’ learning that are not possible with other media. Pedagogical literature has proved that individuals have different learning styles. Flipped classroom is a pedagogical approach which means that activities that have traditionally taken place inside the classroom take place outside the classroom and vice versa. The flipped classroom environment ensures that students become more active participants compared with in the traditional classroom. The purpose of this paper is to fulfil the needs regarding the review of recent literature on the use of the flipped classroom approach in education. The contribution of the flipped classroom to education is discussed in relation to the changes in students' and instructors' role. Subsequently, flipped classroom applications in various disciplines of education are illustrated. The recommendations made in the literature for design specifications that integrate flipped classrooms with technology are discussed. The paper concludes that a careful consideration of the warnings and recommendations made in the literature can help to produce effective flipped classroom environments and also this paper attempts to inform those who are thinking of using new technologies and approaches to deliver courses.

 Keywords: flipped classroom, inverted classroom, blended learning, active learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Flipped classroom: A review of recent literature. (2015). World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 7(2), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v7i2.46
Section
Articles

References

Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80.

Boyd, D. M., and Ellison, N. B. (2007), Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computerâ€Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.

Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175.

Cohen, J. N. (2012). Review: The Potential of Google+ as a Media Literacy Tool. The Journal of Media Literacy Education, 4(1), 9. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1086&context=jmle

Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6).

Corrocher, N. (2011). The adoption of web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4), 547-558.

Curran, K., Morrison, S., & Mc Cauley, S. (2012). Google+ v Facebook: The comparison. TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication, Computing, Electronics and Control, 10(2), 379-388.

Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R. ve Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.

Davis, M. (2008). Semantic Wave 2008 Report: Industry Roadmap to Web 3.0 & Multibillion Dollar Market Opportunities. Executive Summary. Retrieved from: http://www.eurolibnet.eu/files/REPOSITORY/20090507165103_SemanticWaveReport2008.pdf

Educause Learning Initiative (2008). 7 things you should know about Google Apps. Retrieved 10 Novomber 2014 from: https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7035.pdf

Erkollar, A., & Oberer, B. (2011). Trends in Social Media Application: The potential of Google+ for education shown in the example of a bachelor’s degree course on marketing. In Software Engineering, Business Continuity, and Education, 257, 569-578.

Frazel, M. (2009). Using Google and Google tools in the classroom: Grades 5 and up. Teacher Created Resources, Westminster, Calif.

González-Martínez, J. A., Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Gómez-Sánchez, E., & Cano-Parra, R. (2015). Cloud computing and education: A state-of-the-art survey. Computers & Education, 80, 132-151.

Grossman, R. L. (2009). The case for cloud computing. IT professional, 11(2), 23-27.

Hamlen, K. W., & Thuraisingham, B. (2013). Data security services, solutions and standards for outsourcing. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 35(1), 1–5.

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007a). ISTE standarts students. Retrieved 24 November 2014 from: http://www.iste.org

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007b). ISTE standarts teachers. Retrieved 24 November 2014 from: http://www.iste.org

Jou, M., & Wang, J. J. (2013). Observations of achievement and motivation in using cloud computing driven CAD: Comparison of college students with high school and vocational high school backgrounds. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 364–369.

Judd, Charles M.; Smith, Eliot R. & Kidder, Louise H. (1991). Research methods in social relations (6th edition). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.

Kaste, M. (2011). Facebook's Newest Challenger: Google Plus. Retrieved 24 November 2014 from: http://jagonews.com/2011/07/google-plus-facebooks-newest-challenger-preview/

Mason, R. (2006). Learning technologies for adult continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121-133.

Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453.

McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43.

Murray, K. E., & Waller, R. (2007). Social networking goes abroad. International Educator, 16(3), 56-59.

Osman, F. Y., & Ab Rahim, N. Z. (2011, November). Self-disclosure and Social network sites users' awareness. In Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 2011 International Conference on IEEE, 1-6.

Parker, K., & Chao, J. (2007). Wiki as a teaching tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 57-72.

Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PEW RESEARCH, (2012). Social Networking Popular Across Globe. Retrieved 20 November 2014 from: http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/12/12/social-networking-popular-across-globe/

Ponnudurai, P., & Jacob, T. T. (2014). Facebook: A shift from social to academia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 122-129.

Revere, L., & Kovach, J. V. (2011). Online technologies for engaged learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 113-124.

Selwyn, N. (2007). ‘Screw Blackboard... do it on Facebook!’: an investigation of students’ educational use of Facebook. Ponencia. En: Poke.

Shaw, C. (2014). Implementing an online social network for health communication (Unpublished Master Thesis). The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Siegle, D. (2010). Cloud Computing: A free technology option to promote collaborative learning. Gifted Child Today, 33(4), 41-45. Retrieved July 12 2014 from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ898571.pdf on

Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2013). I see you: Using the affordances of Google+ to increase social and teaching presence in an online undergraduate teacher education course. ISTE 2013, San Antonio, TX.

Sultan, N. (2010). Cloud computing for education: A new dawn?. International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 109-116.

Tal-Elhasid, E., & Meishar-Tal, H. (2007). Wikis in academic courses: Models of usage and collaboration. Learning in the technological era, 127-136.

Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.

TUÄ°K, (2014). Hane halki bilisim teknolojileri kullanim araÅŸtirmasi. Retrieved November 15, 2014 from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=16198

Vaquero, L. M., Rodero-Merino, L., Caceres, J., & Lindner, M. (2008). A break in the clouds: towards a cloud definition. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 50-55.

Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428-438.

Watson, J., Besmer, A., & Lipford, H. R. (2012, July). + Your circles: sharing behavior on Google+. In Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (p. 12). ACM.

Wu, T. T. (2014). Using smart mobile devices in social-network-based health education practice: A learning behavior analysis. Nurse Education Today, 34(6), 958-963.

Yee, K., & Hargis, J. (2011). Using Google+ for instruction. (Notes for Editor-1) Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(4), 1302-6488.

Yensen, J. (2012). Mentoring and performance support for graduate students using Google+. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), 16(3).

Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara: Seckin Yayinevi.