The importance of simulation in nursing education

Main Article Content

Abstract

Nursing education involves a practice-oriented curriculum in which emphasis is placed on both theoretical knowledge and psychomotor skills. In skill-based education, where learning through practice occupies a central role, it is important to ensure the integration of theoretical knowledge into practice. In this context, simulations represent an innovative teaching method that stimulates a number of senses at the same time among learners. Simulation is a method which can be designed to reflect real-life conditions, and which provides the opportunity to work in contexts that are closer and more representative of real settings. Depending on the clinical situation or scenario; the simulation method will involve a student or a group of students performing a number of patient care activities on a manikin, player or standardized patient. The simulation method allows students to repeatedly practice their clinical skills until they develop a sense of proficiency; to learn at their own pace; and to freely make mistakes. Simulations is an educational process that can replicate clinical practices in a safe environment. Nursing students who take part in education programs involving simulations perform less medical mistakes in clinical settings, and are able to better develop their critical thinking and clinical decision-making skills. For these reasons, we recommend that simulations, which represent an interactive learning method, are rendered more common in institutions providing nursing education.

 

Keywords: Simulation; nursing education; nursing students

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
The importance of simulation in nursing education. (2017). World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 9(1), 02–07. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v9i1.543
Section
Articles

References

Aslan, A. (2009). Bütçe Açığı Sürdürülebilirliğinin Dinamik Analizi: Türkiye Örneği. Maliye Dergisi, 157, 227-234.

Shyh-Wei Chen, (2014). Testing for fiscal sustainability: New evidence from the G-7 and some European countries, Economic Modelling, 37, 1-15.

Ehrhart, C. & Llorca, M. (2008). The Sustainability of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from a Panel of Six South-Mediterranean Countries. Applied Economics Letters, 15, 797-803.

Hepsağ, A. (2011). Mali Politikaların Sürdürülebilirliğinin Yapısal Kırılmalı Periyodik Birim Kök Testi ile Analizi: Türkiye Örneği. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 12(1), 32-45.

Joseph, S. A. (2010). Financing Recovery: Implications of Natural Disaster Expenditure on the Fiscal Sustainability of the Eastern Caribbean Currency Unit (ECCU) States. Journal of Business, Finance and Economics in Emerging Economies, 5(2), 39-80.

Kremers, J.J.M., (1989). U.S. Federal Indebtedness and the Conduct of Fiscal Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 219-238.

Lumsdaıne, R.L., & Papell, D.H. (1997). Multiple Trend Breaks And The Unit Root Hypothesis. The Review Of Economics And Statistics, 79(2), 212- 218.

Lee, J., & Strazıcıch, M.C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test With Two Structural Breaks. The Review Of Economics And Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089.

Marks, V.S. (2004). Fiscal Sustainability and Solvency: Theory and Recent Experience in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesia Economic Studies, 40(2), 227-242.

Perron, P. (1989). The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, And The Unit Root Hypothesis, Econometrica, 57(6), 1361-1401.

Yol, M.A. (2009). Testing the Sustainability of Current Account Deficits in Developing Economies: Evidence from Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia. The Journal of Developing Areas, 43(1), 177-197.

Zıvot, E., Andrews, D. (1992). Further Evidence On The Great Crash, The Oilprice Shock, And The Unit Root Hypothesis. Journal Of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.