School Attachment and Peer Bullying as the Predictors of Early Adolescents’ Resilience
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a relationship among resilience, school attachment, peer-bullying levels and the extent to which the variables of school attachment and peer bullying levels contribute to the prediction of resilience. The study was carried out with 355 secondary school students in Ankara, 195 (%55) of which were girls, 160 (%45) which were boys. Resilience Scale for Early Adolescents, School Attachment Scale for Children and Adolescents, The Peer Bully-Victim Questionnaire- Adolescent Form were used in the study. Correlation Coefficient of Pearson Moments and Hierarchical Regression Analysis were used in the analysis of the data. As a consequence, it was determined that there is a positive relationship between resilience and school attachment but a negative relationship between resilience and peer bullying. Also, it was observed that the variables of school attachment, peer bullying significantly predict resilience.
Â
Keywords: Resilience, school attachment, peer bullying, early adolescent
Â
Downloads
Article Details
References
Achenbach, T.M. (2009). Some Needed Changes in DSM-V: But What About Children?.
Clinical Psychology Science Practice, 16, 50-53.
Adam, D. (2013). Mental health: On the spectrum. Nature, 496, 416-418.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC:Author.
Anello, E. (1989). DSM-III Is a Useful Tool: Response to Kutchins and Kirk. National
Associaton of Social Workers, 1, 189.
Camnalbur, M., Bayraktar, M. D. & Amuce, E. N. (2013). The effect of web-based instruction on achievement: A meta-analysis study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 8, (3), 292-301.
Corrigan, P. (2007). How Clinical Diagnosis Might Exacerbate the Stigma of Mental Illness.
Social Work, 52, 31-39.
Cooper, R. (2004). What is Wrong with the DSM? History of Psychiatry, 15, 5-25
First, M. & Spitzer, R. L. (2003). The DSM: Not Perfect But Beter Than the Alternative.
Psychiatric Times, 20, 1-2.
Ghaneian, S., Z. & Rahimi, C., R. (2012). The prediction of the type of mental disorders symptoms by personality traits and perfectionism dimensions, Global Journal of Psychology Research, 2, 30-35.
Joyce, P.R. (2008). Classification of Mood Disorders in DSM-V and DSM-VI. Australian
and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 851-862.
Obiols, J. E. (2012). DSM 5: Precedents present and prospects. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 281 -290.
Pierre, J.M. (2008). Deconstructing Schizophrenia for DSM-V: Challenges for Clinical and
Research Agendas. Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses, 2, 166-174.
Reed, G. M., Anaya, C. & Et Evans, S. C. (2012). What is the ICD and why is important in psychology?. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 461-473.
Saban, A. (2009). Coklu zeka kurami ile ilgili Turkce calismalarin icerik analizi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 9, (2), 833-876.
Wakefield, J. C. (2016). Diagnostic Issues and Controversies in DSM-5: Return of the False Positives Problem. Annual Review Of Clinical Psychology, 12105-132.
Wing, L., Gould, J. & Gillberg, C. (2011). Autism spectrum disorders in the DSM-V: better or worse than the DSM-IV?. Research in developmental disabilities, 32(2), 768-773.
Woo, B.S.C. & Rey, J.M. (2005). The Validity of the DSM-IV Subtypes of ADHD,
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 344-353.
World Health Organization. (2014). Mental health: a state of well-being. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/mental_health/en/ on 10 April 2016.