Examination Of Parents’ Anxıety About Their Gifted Children’s Education

Main Article Content

Abstract

Sciences and Arts Centers provide opportunities of creating and applying projects to the individuals who has superior intelligence. These institutions educate them to put science into the center of their lives by focusing these people’s potentials. It is important to make them productive, developing their problem-solving skills and support them to create innovative ideas. In this study,  parents’ ideas about future job choices of their gifted children, limitations in social settings, efficiency of physical conditions of institutions, education of teachers and benefits of Sciences and Arts Centers has been searched. 21 teenagers’ parents have participated voluntarily.  In this qualitative research, both secondary school and Sciences and Arts Centers’ absence of physical opportunities of buildings, lack of laboratories and materials has been identified as problems. However, results emphasize that these centers lead children to be interested in natural sciences, arts and mathematics. What is more, they are beneficial and necessary to improve youngsters’ self-confidence, social skills and abilities to express them freely. Families may demand from government to construct efficient and high quality schools which are suitable to European standards and to support them economically. Furthermore, the Ministry of National Education should assign the Provincial Directorates for National Education to give seminars and conferences to inform teachers and parents to realize the differences of gifted children in early ages. It may also be advantageous to prepare brochures, posters, and handbooks to give them. In addition to these activities, related departments of universities might be the part of the project and it may reach larger masses in the society.

 

Keywords: superior intelligence, gifted, sciences and arts centers, teachers, education

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Examination Of Parents’ Anxıety About Their Gifted Children’s Education. (2016). Global Journal of Psychology Research: New Trends and Issues, 6(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjpr.v6i2.638
Section
Articles

References

Akgün-Kostak, M., Aras, T., & Akarsu, Ö. (2012). Opinions of nursing students about clinic nurses’s contributions related to their clinical education. Cumhuriyet Nursing Journal, 2, 39-46.

Clynes, M. P., & Raftery, S. E. ( 2008). An essential element of student learning in clinical practice . Nurse Education in Practice; 18, 405-411.

Croxon, L., & Magginis, C. (2009). Evaluation of teaching models for nursing practice. Nuse Education in Practice, 9, 236-243.

Elcigil, A., & Sarı, H. Y. (2007). Determining Problems experienced by student nurses in their work with clinical educators in Turkey. Nurse Education Today, 7, 491-498.

Erenel, A. Ş., Dal, Ü., Kutlutürkan, S., & Vural, G. (2008). The Views of the Fourth Year Students and Nurses About Internship Practices. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemşirelik Dergisi, 15(2), 16–25.

Esmaeili, M., Cheraghi, M. A., Salsali, M., & Ghiyasvandian, S. (2014). Nursing students’ expectations regarding effective clinical education: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20, 460-467.

Evans, W., & Kelly B. (2004). Pre-registration diploma student nurse stres and copping measures. Nurse Education Today; 24: 473-482.

Henderson, A., Cooke, M., Creedy, D. K., & Walker, R. (2012). Nursing students perceptions of learning in practice environments. Areview. Nurse Education Today, 32, 299-302.

Henneman, E. A., & Cunningham, H. (2005). Using clinical simulation to teach patient safety in an acute/critical care nursing course. Nurse Education, 30(4), 172-177.

Ip, W. Y., & Chan, D. S. ( 2005). Hong Kong nursing students’ perception of the clinical environment: A questionaire suvey. International Journal of Nursinh Studies, 42, 665-672.

Kaphagawani, N.C., & Useh, U. (2013). Analysis of nursing students learning experiences in clinical practice: Literature review. Ethno Med, 7(3), 181-85.

Karimi, M. H., Dabbaghi, F., Oskouie, S. F., & Vehvilainen, J. K. (2010). Teaching style in clinical education: A Qualitative study of Iranian nursing teachers' experiences. Nurse Education in Practice, 10, 8-12.

Mannien, K., Henriksson, E. W., Scheja, M., & Silen, C. (2013). Authenicity in learning-nursing students experiences at a clinical education ward. Health Education, 113(2), 132-143.

Mannix, J., Faga, P., Beale, B., & Jackson, D. (2006). Towards sustainable models for clinical education in nursing. An on going conversation. Nurse Education in Practice, 6, 3-11.

Napthine, R. (1996). Clinical education: a system under pressure. Australian Nursing Journal, 3(9), 20–24.

Papastavrou, E., Lambrinou, E., Tsangari, H., Saariskoski, M., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2010). Stodent nurses experience of learning in clinical environbment. Nurse Education Practice, 10, 176-182.

Pearcey, P. A., & Elliott, B. E. (2004). Student impressions of clinical nursing. Nurse Education Today, 24, 382-387.

Safadi, R. R., Saleh, M., Nasser, O. S., Amre, H. M., & Froelicher, E. S. (2011). Nursing student perceptions of nursing. A descriptive study of four cohorts. International Nursing Review, 58, 420-427

Sharif, F., & Masoumi S. (2005). A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of clinical practice. BMC Nursing, 4:6, doi:10.1186/1472-6955-4-6. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/4/6

Twentyman, M., Eaton, E. & Henderson, A. (2006). Enhancing support for nursing students in the clinical setting. Nursing Times, 102(14), 35-37.