Second language acquisition: competency model with using Interactive technology in the EL classroom

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 12, 2017
Versions:
2017-01-12 (1)

Main Article Content

Abstract

Cross-cultural communication in the context of competence and educational system is the major focus in this project. The paper concerns the issue of cross-cultural communication in the sphere of university education in the EL classroom. Special attention is given to the problems of innovation potential of different methods and models for the formation of cross-cultural competency. The article concentrates on developing cross-cultural awareness that students of non-linguistic higher schools should have knowledge in order to effectively communicate with other people. This awareness can be developed by means of particular didactic organization of a foreign language teaching process. Some methods and models aimed at students’ adopting peculiarities of foreign non-linguistic reality are considered here. Moreover, the author argues that there is a necessity to pay extra attention to the parameters of shaping cross-cultural competence. It is claimed that intercultural sensitizer (culture assimilator) is one of the most adequate and efficient techniques in enhancing cross-cultural competence in the process of training.    

 

Keywords: Cross-cultural competence; innovative potential; methods and models of teaching; didactic organization

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Second language acquisition: competency model with using Interactive technology in the EL classroom. (2017). New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(5). Retrieved from https://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/pntsbs/article/view/1115
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 5 (2016): Selected Papers of 4th Cyprus International Conference on Educational Research (CYICER-2015)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Albert, R.D. (1993). The intercultural sensitizer or culture assimilator: A cognitive approach. Handbook of Intercultural Training, 2 (4), pp. 8-15.
Bennett, J. (1993).Cultural marginality: identity issues in intercultural training. Education for the intercultural experience /Ed. by Paige M. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, pp.109-135.
Helfer, M.E., Kempe, R.S. & Krugman, R.D. (1997). The battered child (5th ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Byram, M. & Fleming, M. (eds.) (1998). Language learning in intercultural perspective: approaches through drama and ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language: 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.
Grushevitskaya, T.G., Popkov, V.D. & Sadokhin, A.P. (2003). Osnovy Mezhkulturnoj Kommunikacii: Uchebnik dlya Vuzov, Moscow: Moscow University Press.
Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of effective communication. In W.R. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, pp.281–322. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hall, E. & Hall, M. (1997). Hidden Differences, Studies in International Communication: How to Communicate with Germans. Hamburg.
Hofstede, G. (2010). Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind. Maastricht: McGraw Hill Professional.
Karasik, V.I. (2009). Yazykovye Klyuchi. Moscow University Press.
Kramsch, C. & Thorne S. (2002.) Foreign language learning as global communicative practice: Language learning and teaching in the age of globalization / Ed. by D. Block & D. Cameron. London: Routledge.
Liaw, M. (2006). E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning and Technology, 3 (10), pp.49-64.
Martin, J. & Nakayama, T. (2000). Intercultural communication in contexts. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publication company.
Nurtazina, M. (2012). Cross-Cultural Communication in Educational Paradigm: Comparative Study: Central Asia: Regionalization vs. Globalization. Proceeding of the 9th KIMEP International Research Conference (KIRC), pp.212-219.
Sbornik Zakonov po Obrazovaniyu v Respublike Kazakhstan (2012). Zakon respubliki kazaxstan «ob obrazovanii (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 10.07.2012 g.). Astana: Ministry of Education and Sciences. Government Printing Office.
Spitzberg, B.H. (1997). A model of intercultural communication competence. Inter-cultural communication. – N.Y.: Wadsworth Publishing Company, pp.379-392.
Ter-Minasova, S.G. (2012). Yazyk i Mezhkulturnaya Kommunikatsiya. Moscow: Moscow State University.