Developing intercultural competence of trainee translators

Main Article Content

Abstract

Intercultural competence is one of the key aspects of a translator / interpreter competence as it contributes to better understanding of the source text and thus, its more ‘ideal’ conveying into the target language. The purpose of this research is to clarify the areas requiring improvement in the process of developing trainee translators’ intercultural competence in the context of Kazakhstani education. Questionnaires for instructors teaching Practical English course and translation courses were used to collect data about the most problematic aspects of to-be translators’ training and cultural awareness of students. The preliminary results of the research show the lack of cultural information at phonetic, intonation and grammar levels, which supposes developing of a special system of exercises and integrating two different pathways represented by theoretical courses such as lingua-cultural studies and practical courses like English for specific professional purposes

Keywords: intercultural competence, ELT, translator / interpreter trainin, interpersonal skills, communication strategies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Developing intercultural competence of trainee translators. (2016). Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(3), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v6i3.1663
Section
Articles

References

Anderson, A., Anderson, J. & Shapiro, J. (2004). Mathematical discourse in shared storybook reading. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(1), 5–33.

Billings, E. M. H. & Beckmann, C. E. (2005). Children's Literature: A Motivating Context to Explore Functions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(9), 470–478.

Capraro, R. M. & Capraro, M. M. (2006). Are you really going to read us a story? Learning geometry through children’s mathematics literature. Reading Psychology, 27, 21–36.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) Research methods in education. Routledge: Falmer.

Courtade, R. C., Lingo, A., S., Karp, K.S. & Whithey, T. (2013). Shared story reading teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(3), 34–44.

Cresswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research 4th edition (pp. 269–283). United States of America: Sage Publications, Inc.

Edelman, J. (2012). The emperor’s new clothes: Is there empirical support for the use of children’s literature in mathematics? The 62nd Annual Conference of the Literacy Research Association. San Diego, CA.

English, L. D. (2010). Young children’s early modelling with data. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 24–47.

FNBE (2014) Perusopetuksen perusteluonnokset (2016). [The sketch of the national core curriculum for basic education.] Retrieved (10.8.2014) from http://www.oph.fi/ops2016/perusteluonnokset/perusopetus

Flevares, L. M. & Schiff, J. L. (2014). Learning mathematics in two dimensions: A review and look ahead at teaching and learning early childhood mathematics with children’s literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–12.

Grossman, P. (2001). Research on the teaching of literature: Finding a place. In V. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching. Washington D.C.: American Educational Research Association, 416–432.

Haapasalo, L. (2008). Pitääkö ymmärtää voidakseen tehdä vai pitääkö tehdä voidakseen ymmärtää? [Does one need to understand in order to do or does one need to do in order to understand.] In P. Räsänen, P. Kupari, T. Ahonen, & P. Malinen (Eds.) Matematiikka – Näkökulmia opettamiseen ja oppimiseen 2nd Edition, [Mathematics – Perspectives for teaching and learning] (pp. 50–83). Jyväskylä: Niilo Mäki Instituutti.

Hatano, G. & Inagaki, K. (1998). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York: W. H. Freeman.

Heflin, B. R. & Barksdale-Ladd, M. A. (2001). African American children’s literature that helps students find themselves: Selection guidelines for grades K-3. Reading Teacher, 54(8), 810–819.

Hellwig, S. J., Monroe, E. E., & Jacobs, J. S. (2000). Making informed choices - Selecting children’s trade books for mathematics instruction. Teaching Children Mathematics 4 (November), 138–143.

Hong, H. (1996). Effects of mathematics learning through children’s literature on math achievement and dispositional outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 477–494.

Hunsander, P. D. (2004). Mathematics trade books: Establishing their value and assessing their quality. The Reading Teacher, 57(7), 618–629.

Hynds, S. (1990). Reading as social event: Comprehension and response in the text, classroom and world. In D. Bogdan & S. Shaw (Eds.) Beyond communication. Reading comprehension and criticism (pp. 170–210). Portsmouth: Heineman.

Imbens, G. W. & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kontu, A. & Sointu, M. (2010). Tehtävä maassa. [The mission in Earth]. Helsinki: Gummerus.

Leino, J. (2008). Konstruktivismi opetuksessa. [Constructivism in teaching] In P. Räsänen, P. Kupari, T. Ahonen, & P. Malinen (Eds.) Matematiikka – Näkökulmia opettamiseen ja oppimiseen 2nd Edition [Mathematics – Perspectives for teaching and learning.] (pp. 20–31). Jyväskylä: Niilo Mäki Instituutti.

Marston, J. (2010). Developing a framework for the selection of picture books to promote early mathematical development. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 383 - 390.

Nesmith, S. & Cooper, S. (2010). Trade books in the mathematics classroom: The impact of many, varied perspectives on determinations of quality. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 24(4), 279–297.

Nikolajeva, M. (2013). Picturebooks and emotional literacy. The Reading Teacher, 67 (4), 249–254.

Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Poetic justice. The literary imagination and public life. Boston: Beacon Press.

Piazzoli, E. & Kennedy, C. (2014). Drama: Threat or opportunity? Managing the ‘dual affect’ in process drama. Scenario (1).

Schatzer, J. (2008). Picture book power: Connecting children’s literature and mathematics. The Reading Teacher, 61(8), 649–653.

Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research: Contemporary issues in an emerging field. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research 4th edition (pp. 285–299). United States of America: Sage Publications, Inc.

Toivonen, P.-M. (1998). Uusien maailmojen viestit: Kirjallisuuden lukemisen semioottis-psykolingvistinen teoria ja käytäntö¨. [Message of new worlds: Semiotic-psycholinguistic theory and practice of literacy reading.] Doctoral Thesis.Department of teacher education in Rauma. University of Turku.

Wiburne, J., M. & Napoli, J. (2008). Connecting mathematics and literature: An analysis of pre-service elementary school teachers’ changing beliefs and knowledge. IUMPST: The Journal, 2, 1–10.

Young-Loveridge, J. M. (2004). Effects on early numeracy of a program using number books and games. Early childhood research quarterly, 19, 82–98.