A discourse analysis of parents’ attitudes towards their children’s gender in Turkey

Main Article Content

Sibel Baykut
Ali Rahimi

Abstract

Children’s gender is a very sensitive issue intertwined with a myriad of psychophysiological and sociopolitical parameters. It plays an important role in determining women’s status in the household and men’s status within the male community at large. In some societies, there is a stigma attached to female children. Giving birth to a baby girl or not having a son can lead to the feelings of shame, embarrassment, disillusionment and ignominy on the side of the parents, specially for the mothers who have to see having sons as the signs of prestige, popularity and glory. Strangely enough, the male-dominated society treats sonless fathers as impotent! This study has been an attempt to shed some light on the interplay between love, gender, discourse, emotions and identity. The whole process of the interrelation between love, gender and behavioural patterns is surrounded by prejudice, hegemonic patriarchal discourse and cultural beliefs and value systems.


Keywords: Motherhood, gender, fatherhood, love, discourse, patriarchal attitude, identity, preference for male children

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Baykut, S., & Rahimi, A. (2016). A discourse analysis of parents’ attitudes towards their children’s gender in Turkey. Global Journal of Psychology Research: New Trends and Issues, 6(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjpr.v6i2.348
Section
Articles

References

Henrietta Louise Moore, Feminist Anthropology: What Difference Does It Make? (London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 1988), 193.

Nany Chodorow, „Family Structure and Feminine Personality‟, in Woman, Culture and Society, ed. Michelle Zimbalist Rosaldo, (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974), 43-66.

David C. McClelland, The Achieving Society (Princeton: D. Van Nostran, 1961), 144.

Monica Das Gupta. „Selective Discrimination against Female Children in Rural Punjab, India‟, Population and Development Review (1987): 77-10.

Everett M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation (New York: Free Press, 1962), 117.

Lena Edlund, „Son Preference, Sex Ratios, and Marriage Patterns‟, Journal of Political Economy (1999): 1275-1305.

Stan D'Souza and Lincoln Chen, „Sex Differentials in Mortality‟, Population and Development Review (1980): 257-270.

Amartya Sen and Sunil Sengupta, „Malnutrition of Rural Children and the Sex Bias‟, Economic and Political Weekly (1983): 855-857.

Monica Das Gupta and P.N. Mari Bhat, „Fertility Decline and Increased Manifestation of Sex Bias in India‟, Population Studies (1997): 307-315.

Woojin Chung and Monica Das Gupta, „The Decline of Son Preference in South Korea: The Roles of Developent and Public Policy‟, Population Council (2007): 759.

Sukru Tezer, Ataturk’un Hatira Defteri (Ankara: T.T.K. Basımevi, 1972).

Emel Dogramaci, Turkiye’de Kadinin Dunu ve Bugunu (Ankara: Turkiye Is Bankasi Yayinlari, 1989), 1-2.

Dogramaci, 102.

Cemal Kurnaz, Turkiye-Orta Asya Edebi Iliskileri. (Ankara:Akçag Yayinlari, 1999), 99-100.

Sefika Kurnaz, Cumhuriyet Oncesinde Türk Kadini, 1839-1923. No. 4. (Ankara: TC Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu Başkanlığı, 1991).

Burhan Goksel, „Caglar Boyunca Turk Kadını ve Ataturk‟, Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi, (1998).

Sefika Kurnaz, Cumhuriyet Oncesinde Türk Kadini, 1839-1923.

Oktay Yenal, Cumhuriyet'in Ä°ktisat Tarihi (Istanbul: Turkiye Is Bankasi Kultur Yayinlari, 2010), 7-8.

Milletvekili Genel Secimleri 1923-2011, (Ankara: Turkiye Istatistik Kurumu Raporu, 2011) 10.

Yahya Akyuz, Türk Eğitim Tarihi (Ankara: Milli Eğitim Yayınları, 2000), 2931.

Mehmet Ali Seven and Ali Osman Engin, „Turkiyede Kadinin Egitimi Alanindaki Esitsizlikler‟, Ataturk Universitesi Dergisi, (2007) 187.

Emre Kongar, Demokrasimizle Yüzleşmek ( İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1997), 85.

Hasan Tahsin Fendoğlu, Basbakanlik Insan Haklari Başkanligi2007 Tore ve Namus Cinayetleri Raporu (Ankara: Başbakanlık İnsan Hakları Baskanligi, 2007),

Bibliography

Akyuz, Yahya. Türk Eğitim Tarihi. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Yayınları, 2000.

Atasü, Erendiz. 'Erendiz Atasü's Personal Web Page'. Accessed May 29, 2013. <http://www.erendizatasu.com>.

Chodorow, Nacy. „Family Structure and Feminine Personality.‟ In Woman, Culture and Society, edited by Michelle Zimbalist Rosaldo, 43-66. Stanford: Stanford University Press , 1974.

Chung, Woojin, and Monica Das Gupta. „The Decline of Son Preference in South Korea: The Roles of Developent and Public Policy.‟ Population Council, 2007: 757-783.

Croll, Elisabeth. Endangered Daughters:Discrimination and Development in Asia. London: Routledge, 2000.

Das Gupta, Monica, and P.N. Mari Bhat. „Fertility Decline and Increased Manifestation of Sex Bias in India.‟ Population Studies, 1997: 307-315.

Dasgupta, Partha. An Inquiry into Wellbeing and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.

Dogramacı, Emel. Türkiye’de Kadının Dünü ve Bugünüâ€, Türkiye Ä°ÅŸ Bankası Yayınları, Ankara. Is Bankasi Yayinlari: Ankara, 1989.

D'Souza, Stan, and Lincoln Chen. “Sex differentials in mortality.‟ Population and Development Review, 1980: 257-270.

Edlund, Lena. „Son Preference, Sex Ratios, and Marriage Patterns.‟ Journal of Political Economy (Stockholm School Econ.), 1999: 1275-1305.

Fendoğlu, Hasan Tahsin. Başbakanlık İnsan Hakları Başkanlığı 2007 Töre ve Namus Cinayetleri RaporuU. Ankara: Başbakanlık İnsan Hakları Başkanlığı, 2007.

Goodkind, Daniel. „On Substituting Sex Preference Strategies in East Asia: Does Prenatal sex Selection Reduce Postnatal Discrimination?‟ Population and Development Rev. , 1996: 111-25.

Göksel, Burhan. „Çağlar Boyunca Türk Kadını ve Atatürk.‟ Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi, 1998.

Greenhalg, Susan. „Sexual Stratification: The Other Side of „Growth with Equity" in East Asia.‟ Population and Development Review, 1985: 265-314.

Gupta, Monica Das. „Informal Security Mechanisms and Population Retention in Rural India.‟ Economic Development and Cultural Change,, 1987: 101-20.

Gupta, Monica Das. „Selective Discrimination against Female Children in Rural Punjab, India.‟ Population and Development Review, 1987: 77-100.

Hanley, Susan B. „Toward an Analysis of Demographic and Economic Change in Tokugawa Japan: A Village Study.‟ The Journal of Asian Studies, 1972: 515-37.

Haughton, Jonathan, and Dominique Haughton. „Son Preference in Vietnam.‟ Studies in Family Planning, 1995: 325-37.

Kongar, Emre. Demokrasimizle Yüzleşmek. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1997.

Kurnaz, Cemal. Türkiye-Orta Asya Edebi İlişkileri. Akçag Yayinlari: Ankara, 1999.

Kurnaz, Şefika. Cumhuriyet öncesinde Türk kadını, 1839-1923. No. 4. Ankara: TC Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu Başkanlığı, 1991.

McClelland, David C. The Achieving Society. Princeton: D. Van Nostran, 1961.

Moore, Henrietta L. „Feminist Anthropology: What Difference Does It Make?‟ In Feminism and Anthropology, by Henrietta L. Moore. London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 1988.

Murphy, Robert F., and Leonard Kasdan. „The Structure of Parellel Cousin Marriage.‟ American Anthropologist, 1959: 17-29.

Park, Chai-Bin, and Nam-Hoon Cho. „Consequences of Son Preferencein a LowFertility Society: Imbalanceof the Sex Ratio at Birth in Korea.‟ Population and Development, 1995: 59-84.

Pong, Suet-Ling. „Sex Preference and Fertility in Peninular Malaysia.‟ Studies in Family Planning, 1994: 137-48.

Rogers, Everett M. Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press, 1962.

Rosenzweig, Mark R., and T. Paul Schultz. „Market opportunities, Genetic Endowments, and Intrafamily ResourceDistribution: Child Survival in Rural India.‟ A.E.R., 1982: 803-15.

Love, Motherhood, Discourse and Children’s Gender in Turkey Sen, Amartya, and Sunil Sengupta. „Malnutrition of Rural Children and the Sex Bias.‟ Economic and Political Weekly, 1983: 855-857.

Seven, Mehmet Ali, and Ali Osman Engin. „Turkiyede Kadinin Egitimi Alanindaki Esitsizlikler.‟ Ataturk Universitesi Dergisi, 2007: 177-189.

Tezer, Şükrü. ‘Atatürk’ün Hatıra Defteri. Ankara: T.T.K. Basımevi, 1972.

Yenal, Oktay. Cumhuriyet'in İktisat Tarihi. Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2010.