Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Thai Secondary World Class Standard School

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 17, 2016
Versions:
2016-01-17 (1)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v8i1.513

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationship and effect of administrative factors that affecting the effectiveness of Thai World class Standard Schools. A total of 375 samples were selected by using stratified random sampling. Researchers employed a survey designed questionnaire as research instrument to collect data. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics such as percentage, mean score, standard deviation and stepwise multiple regression analysis. Findings of the study revealed that all the factors affecting the effectiveness of Thai World Class Standard Schools were at high level. Strategic planning factor was identified as highest mean score whereas teacher professional development factor was found as lowest mean score. Consequently, result also revealed that there were four significant predictors toward effectiveness of Thai Secondary World Class Standard Schools. These four significant predictors were factors for using information and communication technology(X8), teacher professional development (X6), internal process management (X2), and the focus on learners and stakeholder (X7) which have successful contributed 65.60 percent variance of effectiveness of Thai World Class Standard Schools at 0.01 significance level with multiple correlation coefficient as 0.81. This study is able is to promote the importance of factors that affecting effectiveness of Thai World Class Standard Schools.

Keywords: School effectiveness; World Class Standard School; administrative factors

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Thai Secondary World Class Standard School. (2016). International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v8i1.513
Issue
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2016): January
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).

References

Assael, H. (1993). Marketing, Second Edition, The Dryden Press, Orlando, s362-429.

AYDIN, K. (2005). Hizmet İsletmelerinde Servqual Yontemi İle Hizmet Kalitesinin Olcumu ve Kocaeli'ndeki Seyahat İsletmelerinden Efe Tur Uygulaması. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, (50).

Bozdag, N., Atan, M., & Altan, S. (2003). Hizmet sektorunde toplam hizmet kalitesinin SERVQUAL analizi ile olcumu ve bankacılık sektorunde bir uygulama. VI. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu, 29-30.

Bumin, B., & Erkutlu, H. (2002). Toplam Kalite Yonetimi ve Kıyaslama (Benchmarking) İliskileri. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 4(1), 1-17.

Bulbul, H., & Demirer, O. (2008). Hizmet kalitesi olcum modelleri SERVQUAL ve SERPERF’in karsılastırmalı analizi. Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 20, 181-198.

Cronin Jr, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. The journal of marketing, 55-68.

Demirel, Y., Yoldas, M. A., & Divanoglu, S. U. (2009). algılanan hizmet kalitesinin tatmin, tavsiye davranısı ve tercih uzerine etkisi: saglık sektorunde bir arastırma. Akademik Bakıs Dergisi, 16(10).

Duening, Thomas N. (2005). Essentials of Business Process Outsourcing, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Erturk, M. (1998). İsletme Biliminin Temel İlkeleri (5. baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.

Folz, David H. (2004). Service Quality and Benchmarking the Performance of Municipal Services, Public Administration Review, 64(2).

Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications.European Journal of marketing, 18(4), 36-44.

Juran, J.M., & Gryna, F.M. (1998). Juran’s Quality Control Handbook, McGraw Hill Co.,USA.

Kaynak, H. (2003). The Relationship Between Total Quality Managament Practices And ?eir EWects On Firm Performance, Journal Of Operations Management 21, 405-435.

Kocel, T. (2010), İsletme Yoneticiligi, 12. Baskı, Beta Basım Yayın No: 2323, İstanbul.

Ozgener, S. (2004). Bir Yonetim Stratejisi Olarak Outsourcing, Cagdas Yonetim Yaklasımları: İlkeler, Kavramlar ve Yaklasımlar , (Ed.) İsmail Bakan, Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul.

Ozturk, S. A. (2000). Hizmet Kalitesi Olcumunde Yeni Bir Yaklasım: Kritik Olaylar Teknigi, Anatolia: Turizm Arastırmaları Dergisi, Yıl:11, Turkce-Eylul-Aralaık, 57-68.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (2002). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Retailing: critical concepts, 64(1), 140.

Robledo, M. A. (2001). Measuring and Managing Service Quality: Integrating Customer Expectations, Managing Service Quality, 11(1), 22-31.

Tavana, M., Mohebbi, B., & Kennedy, D. T. (2003). Total quality index: a benchmarking tool for total quality management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(6), 507-527.