The relationship between perceived learning and student attainment: lectures and problem-based learning sessions
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
There has been a paradigm shift in higher education towards the utilisation of problem-based learning sessions instead of the traditional lecture format which is considered obsolete by detractors and simply convenient by its advocates. This move coincides with research highlighting that active learning strategies promote profound rather than superficial learning, encourage critical thinking and increase student attainment. However, there are limited studies quantifying the attainment of undergraduate students presented with varied pedagogical techniques, and still fewer that assess student perceptions of their own learning. Over four different teaching sessions (two lectures and two problem-based learning), n=94 students completed a 10 question questionnaire comprised of Likeart style questions assessing how advantageous they perceived the teaching strategy implemented to be to their own learning. In addition, n=64 of the students also completed short quizzes at the completion of three out of four of the sessions (one lecture, two problem-based learning sessions) assessing their knowledge of the content covered. There was no significant difference in attainment (quiz score) between the two delivery methods (p = 0.113), however there was a significant difference between individual sessions (p<0.05). Student ratings (total questionnaire score) did not differ between the two delivery methods (p=0.487) or between individual sessions (p=0.748). There was a trend for increased attainment in the problem-based sessions and a decreased student rating in these classes. Findings were in agreement with prior work and highlight the need for a varied approach to teaching in the biological sciences alongside the judicious interpretation of student feedback.
Keywords: problem-based learning; lectures; feedback; attainment; student perception
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).
References
Baeten, M., Struyven, K. & Dochy, F. 2013. Student-centred teaching methods: Can they optimise students’ approaches to learning in professional higher education? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 14-22.
Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., Lubben, F., Campbell, B. & Robinson, A. 2010. Talking science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 69-95.
Besterfield-Sacre, M., Amaya, N. Y., Shuman, L. J., Atman, C. J. & Porter, R. L. Understanding student confidence as it relates to first year achievement. Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998. FIE'98. 28th Annual, 1998. IEEE, 258-263.
Cantillon, P. 2003. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Teaching large groups. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 326, 437.
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D. & Klein, S. P. 2006. Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages*. Research in higher education, 47, 1-32.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., Christopher, A. N., Garwood, J. & Neil Martin, G. 2008. Birds of a feather: Students’ preferences for lecturers’ personalities as predicted by their own personality and learning approaches. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 965-976.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A. & Lewis, M. 2007. Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 241-250.
Dahle, L. O., Brynhildsen, J., Fallsberg, M. B., Rendquist, I. & Hammar, M. 2002. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: examples and experiences from Linköping, Sweden. Medical teacher, 24, 280-285.
Donovon, J., Mader, C. E. & Shinsky, J. 2010. Constructive Student Feedback: Online vs. Traditional Course Evaluations. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9, 283-296.
Ebert-May, D., Brewer, C. & Allred, S. 1997. Innovation in large lectures—teaching for. Bioscience, 47, 9.
Emerson, T. L. & Taylor, B. A. 2004. Comparing student achievement across experimental and lecture-oriented sections of a principles of microeconomics course. Southern Economic Journal, 70, 672-693.
Frederick, P. J. 1986. The lively lecture—8 variations. College teaching, 34, 43-50.
Garside, C. 1996. Look who's talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills.
Gremmen, H. & Potters, J. 1997. Assessing the efficacy of gaming in economic education. The Journal of Economic Education, 28, 291-303.
Jaques, D. 2003. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Teaching small groups. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 326, 492.
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. & Kwan, K. 2002. Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 411-425.
Knight, J. K. & Wood, W. B. 2005. Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4, 298-310.
McClanahan, E. B. & McClanahan, L. L. 2002. Active learning in a non-majors biology class: lessons learned. College teaching, 50, 92-96.
Popil, I. 2011. Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Education Today, 31, 204-207.
Robson, J., Francis, B. & Read, B. 2004. Gender, student confidence and communicative styles at university: the views of lecturers in history and psychology. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 7-23.
Singh, G. 2002. Educational Consumers or Educational Partners: A Critical Theory Analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 681-700.
Singleton-Jackson, J. A., Jackson, D. L. & Reinhart, J. 2010. Students as consumers of knowledge: Are they buying what we’re selling? Innovative Higher Education, 35, 343-358.
Spencer, J. A. & Jordan, R. K. 1999. Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 318, 1280.
Steinert, Y. 2004. Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Medical education, 38, 286-293.
Trelstad, R. L. & Raskova, J. Teaching pathology without lectures through computer-based exercises, small-group discussions and reading. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care, 1992. American Medical Informatics Association, 781.
Van Kampen, P., Banahan, C., Kelly, M., McLoughlin, E. & O’Leary, E. 2004. Teaching a single physics module through Problem Based Learning in a lecture-based curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 72, 829-834.
Walker, J., Cotner, S. H., Baepler, P. M. & Decker, M. D. 2008. A delicate balance: integrating active learning into a large lecture course. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7, 361-367.
Wilkerson, D. J., Manatt, R. P., Rogers, M. A. & Maughan, R. 2000. Validation of student, principal, and self-ratings in 360 feedback® for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14, 179-192.
Wilson, K. & Korn, J. H. 2007. Attention during lectures: Beyond ten minutes. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 85-89.
Woodall, T., Hiller, A. & Resnick, S. 2014. Making sense of higher education: students as consumers and the value of the university experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 48-67.