The Analysis Outcomes of Songs and Activities in the Teacher’s Book of 3rd Grade Music Course

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of learning outcomes with the songs and activities included in the 3rd grade music course. This study employed document analysis of the qualitative methods. Third grade Music course Teacher’s Book, which has been used since 2013-14 academic year, is reviewed. ‘Listening, singing, and playing’, musical perception and exposition’, ‘musical creativity’, and ‘musical culture’ are included in the Primary School Music course Teaching Program. Teacher’s Book lists 13 main learning outcome themes and 23 learning outcomes, and 20 songs to be used for the realization of these outcomes. Of this data, ‘listening, singing, playing’, ‘musical perception’ and ‘musical creativity’ as learning domains, 5 main outcome themes, 8 outcomes and 7 songs to be used for the corresponding outcomes are selected via purposive sampling. This study focuses only on the above-mentioned learning domains, outcomes and songs. The qualitative data of the Teacher’s Book is analyzed and discusses using descriptive analysis approach. The example activities of the Teacher’s Book are reviewed under the themes of outcome, notion, activity, song and evaluation. The result of the study suggests that it is difficult to teach the students expected notions and musical behavior using the activities and songs included in the Teacher’s Book.

 

 

Keywords: Learning outcomes; songs; activities;  3rd grade music course  book

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
The Analysis Outcomes of Songs and Activities in the Teacher’s Book of 3rd Grade Music Course. (2016). International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v8i1.770
Section
Articles

References

Abulghasemzadeh, M. (2005) . Nature of ethical predicates from the perspective of Professor Javadi Amoli. Journal of Porch of Thought. 46, 100-112.

Ahmadpoor, M. (2013). Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy (ISCA). http://www.dte.ir/portal/home.

Atrak, h. (2009). Explanation and Analysis of Kant's Concept of Duty. Journal of Critique & Theory 56, 36-61.

Avani, Sh. (2011). Kantian ethics Duty-oriented or obligation-oriented. Speech at the Iranian Philosophical Society, http://www.ipso.ir.

Bagheri, Kh. (2010). Approaches and research methods in the philosophy of education. Tehran: Institute of Social and Cultural Studies.

Barrow, R. (2012). An Introduction to Moral Philosophy and Moral Education. translated by Zibaklam Mofrad, F., Tehran: Hafeez.

Copleston, F. (1981). Kant. Translated by Bozorgmehr, M., Tehran: Sharif University.

Great Islamic Encyclopedia (2015). Must, http://www.cgie.org.ir;

Haeri Yazdi, M. (2005). Exploration of practical reason: moral philosophy. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy.

Hezavei, M. R. 2001, Beliefs, infrastructure of “musts†(2). Journal of Growth of Islamic Education Quarterly, 46, 27-31.

Javadi Amoli, A. (2002). Philosophy of human rights. Qom: Asra Publication Center.

Javadi Amoli, A. (2005a). Rights and obligations in Islam. Qom: Asra Publication Center.

Javadi Amoli, A. (2005b). Rights and obligations according to Islamic teachings. Journal of Pasdar-e-Islam. 285- 6, http://www.hawzah.net.

Kant, I. (1990). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Enayat, H. & Gheisari, A., Tehran: Khwarizmi.

Kant, I. (1997). Cririque of Practical Reason. Translated and Edited by Gregor, M., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2004b). The Doctrine of virtue: Part 2 0f the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Sanei Darrebidy, M., Tehran: Nagsh-o-Negar.

Kant, I. (2005). The Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Rahmati, E., Tehran: Noorolsaqalayn.

Kant, I. (2009). A Lecture on Ethics. Translated by Sanei Darrebidy, M., Tehran: Nagsh-o-Negar.

Kant. I. (2004a). The Metaphysics of Morals (The Doctrine of Right). Translated by Sanei Darrebidy, M., Tehran: Nagsh-o-Negar.

Korsgaard, C. (2000). Aristotle and Kant on the Source of Value. Translated by Javadi, M., Organon Journal. 16, 95-120;

Mesbah Yazdi, M. T. (1987). Teaching Philosophy. Tehran: IDO.

Mesbah Yazdi, M. T. (2006). Islamic legal theory. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute (rah).

Mo’allemi, H. (2006). Ethics. Journal of Qabasat. 39 & 40, 93-108.

Mo’allemi, H. (2009). Necessary in-relation and in-relation-to-something-else, content of Moral “Mustâ€. Journal of Qabasat. 53, 139-156.

Omid, M. (1998). Must & must not, goodness & badness. Journal of Kheradnameh Sadra. 12, 43-59.

Rabbani Golpayegani, A. (2005). Philosophy of Obligation in ‘Adliyah theologians view (1). Journal of Islamic theology. 56, 13-22.

Rabbani Golpayegani, A. (2006). Philosophy of Obligation in ‘Adliyah theologians view (2). Journal of Islamic theology. 57, 5-20;

Scruton, R. (1996). Kant. translated by Ali Paya. Tehran: Tarh-e no.

Short, E. C. (2009). Forms of curriculum Inquiry. Translated by Mehrmohammadi et al. Tehran: SAMT.

Sullivan, R. J. (2010). Introduction to Kant's Ethics. translated by Fouladvand, E., Tehran: Tarh-e no.

Tabatabai M. H. (1983). Principles of Philosophy and Realism Method. Tehran: Sadra.