Designation of teacher candidates’ self-efficacy and success level in designing multimedia

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Aug 13, 2015
Versions:
2015-08-13 (1)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v7i2.45

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to determine the self-efficacy and success levels of teaching candidates on developing multimedia to the Docebo learning management system through integrating various online tools in developing multimedia courses and using this method in a project-based learning process. Second year students from the department of Computer Education and Educational Technology participated in this research. Random selection method was used in order to assign the students to the groups. Online (30 participants) and blended (30 participants) groups were constituted for this experimental study. Based on the pre-test results of the students participating in the study, it was investigated as to whether there was a difference between the groups. Since pre-test success scores of the students from the two groups would affect the results of the research, the difference between the two groups was examined by applying a t-test. There was no significant difference  in the pre-test scores of the teaching candidates in the group. Data from the research were collected with demographic information forms and 5-point Likert-type scale developed by authors.

 Keywords: multimedia designing, teacher candidates, internet based learning, learning management systems, online learning.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Designation of teacher candidates’ self-efficacy and success level in designing multimedia. (2015). World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 7(2), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v7i2.45
Issue
Vol 7, No 2 (2015): August
Section
Articles

World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues is an Open Access Journal.  The copyright holder is the author/s. Licensee Birlesik Dunya Yenilik Arastirma ve Yayincilik Merkezi, North Nicosia, Cyprus. All articles can be downloaded free of charge. Articles published in the Journal are Open-Access articles distributed under CC-BY license [Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)].

 

Birlesik Dunya Yenilik Arastirma ve Yayincilik Merkezi (BD-Center)is a gold open-access publisher.  At the point of publication, all articles from our portfolio of journals are immediately and permanently accessible online free of charge. BD-Center articles are published under the CC-BY license [Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)], which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and the source are credited.

References

Akbaba Altun, S., (2001, September). Elementary School Principals’ Attitudes towards Technology and Their Computer Experiments. Paper presented at the World Congress on Computational Intelligence (WCCI) Triennial World Conference. Madrid, Spain.

Baran, B., Kilic, E., Bakar Corez, A. & Cagiltay, K. (2010). Turkish University Students’ Technology Use Profiles and Their Thoughts about Distance Education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1).

Bennett, W. L. (2003). The burglar alarm that just keeps ringing: A response to Zaller. Political Communication, 20(2), 131-138.

Blazer, C. (2010). Computer-Based Assessments. Research. Information Capsule, 0918, 1-18.

Bridgeman, C. (2009). Contracts as Plans. U. Ill. L. Rev., 341.

Cox, K., & Clark, D. (1998). The use of formative quizzes for deep learning.Computers and Education, 30(3), 157-168.

De-Siqueira, J. M., Peris-Fajarnes, G. , Gimenez, F. & Magal-Royo , T. (2009). Spanish students and teachers’ preferences towards computer-based and paper-and-pencil tests at universities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 814–817.

Gamire, E., & Pearson, G. (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Island Press.

Garcia Laborda, J.; Magal Royo, T.& Bakieva, M. (2010). A First Approach to the Analysis of Student Motivation in the Trial Version of the Computer Based University Entrance Examination. Paper presented at the CALL conference. Antwerp, Belgium.

Jamil, M. (2012). Perceptions of University Students Regarding Computer Assisted Assessment. TOJET: Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11, 267-277.

Kikis-Papadakis, K., & Kollias, A. (2009). Reflections on paper-and-pencil tests to eAssessments: Narrow and broadband paths to 21st century challenges. The Transition to Computer-Based Assessment, 99.

Kyllonen, P. C. (2009). New constructs, methods, and directions for computer-based assessment. The transition to computer-based assessment, 151-156.

Millet, G. P., Jaouen, B. E. R. N. A. R. D., Borrani, F. A. B. I. O., & Candau, R. O. B. I. N. (2002). Effects of concurrent endurance and strength training on running economy and VO~ 2 kinetics. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 34(8), 1351-1359.

Ogilvie, J. M., Speck, J. D., Lett, J. M., & Fleming, T. T. (1999). A reliable method for organ culture of neonatal mouse retina with long-term survival.Journal of neuroscience methods, 87(1), 57-65.

Paek, J. S. (2005). U.S. Patent No. 6,927,478. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Paterson, K. G. (2002). ID-based signatures from pairingson elliptic curves.Electronics Letters, 38(18), 1025-1026.

Pathan, M. (2012). Computer Assisted Language Testing [CALT]: Advantages, Implications and Limitations. (Research). Retrieved from: http://www.researchvistas.com/

Puhan, M. A., Vollenweider, D., Latshang, T., Steurer, J., & Steurer-Stey, C. (2007). Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: when are antibiotics indicated? A systematic review. Respir Res, 8(30), 1465-9921.

Rabinowitz, S., & Brandt, T. (2001). Computer-Based Assessment: Can It Deliver on Its Promise? Knowledge Brief.

Reid, I. R. (2002). Relationships among body mass, its components, and bone.BoneKEy-Osteovision.

Sapriati, A., & Zuhairi, A. (2010). Using Computer-Based Testing as Alternative Assessment Method of Student Learning in Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education- TOJDE, 11 (2), 161-169.

Sim, G.; Holifield, P., & Brown, M., (2004). Implementation of Computer Assisted Assessment: Lessons from the Literature. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 12(3), 215-229.

Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032-1044.

Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S. S., Albus, D., & Hodgson, J. (2010). Computer-based testing: Practices and considerations (Synthesis Report 78). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Usun, S. (2007). Teacher Training Programs for Computer Education and Computer Assisted Education in Turkey. (Report). Retrieved from: http://eric.ed.gov/?q=usun&ft=on&id=ED500110

Vandal, B. (2010). Getting past go: Rebuilding the remedial education bridge to college success. Education Commission of the States.

Yurdabakan, I. & Uzunkavak, C. (2012). Primary School Students’ Attitudes TOWARDS Computer Based Testing and Assessment in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13, 177-188.