Middle School Advisory: Students' Perceptions of Its Effectiveness

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if an advisory program that is being implemented in a Central Illinois Junior High School is beneficial in meeting the needs of a school’s student population. Studies have shown that advisory programs help students socially and academically, and are critical in the development of adolescents. Literature supports advisory time in that it gives students an adult to connect to and creates a sense of belongingness. A mixed method survey consisting of Likert scale questions, open-ended questions, and multiple choice questions was electronically distributed to the student population after advisory lessons. Data was analyzed by specifically exploring the descriptive statistics. The findings in this study showed students reported the advisory program as effective, necessary, and often provide topics they could relate to.


Keywords: Middle School, Advisory Programs, Adolescents development, perception of effectiveness, social and academic development

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Middle School Advisory: Students’ Perceptions of Its Effectiveness. (2015). International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v7i1.5
Section
Articles

References

Cincioglu, O. (2011). Practicum in English language teaching as perceived by mentors at cooperating schools in Istanbul. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ä°stanbul University, Ä°stanbul, Turkey.

Cook-Sather, A. (2010). Between student and teacher: learning to teach as translation. Teaching Education, 12(2), 177-190.

Gan, Z. (2013). Learning to teach English language in the practicum: what challenges do non-native ESL student-teachers face. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 92-108.

Hastings, W. (2006). Emotions and the practicum: the CTs’ perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10(2), 135-148.

Kabilan, M.K., & Izzaham, R.I.R. (2008). Challenges faced and the strategies adopted by a Malaysian English language teacher during teacher practice. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 87-95.

Kagan, D. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 129-168.

Kahn, B. (2001). Potrait of success: CTs and the student teaching experience. Action in Teacher Education, 22(4), 68-78.

Merc, A. (2010). Self-reported problems of pre-service EFL teachers throughout their practicum. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 199-226.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. Ministry of National Education - MoNE (2007). Ogretmen Adaylarinin Milli Egitim Bakanligi’na Bagli Egitim Ogretim Kurumlarina Yapacaklari Ogretmenlik Uygulamasina Iliskin Yonerge. [Prescription for practice teaching to be fulfilled by prospective teachers in educational institutions of Ministry of National Education]. Tebligler Dergisi, n° 2493.Retrieved March 14, 2014, from: http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/102.html

Murray-Harvey, R., Slee, P. T., Lawson, M. J., Silins, H., Banfield, G., & Russell, A. (2000). Under stress: the concerns and the coping strategies of teacher education students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 19-35.

Richards, J. C., & Crookes, G. (1988). The practicum in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 9- 27. Saglam, G. (2007). Perceived roles, responsibilities and challenges of CT’s in the procedure of teaching practice course in practicum. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Sarıcoban, A. (2010). Problems encountered by student-teachers during their practicum studies. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 707-711.

Salihoglu, U.M. (2012). Pre-service English teacher education: the Turkish case. Contemporary Online Language Education Journal, 2(1), 151-168.

Sinclair, C., Dowson, M., & Thistleton-Martin, J. (2006). Motivations and profiles of CTs: who volunteers and why? Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 263-279.

Smith, K., & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education program: the voice of students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289-302.

Somuncuoglu, Y. (2003). An analysis of change in pre-service education in Turkey by using chaos theory. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Stoynoff, S. (1999). The TESOL practicum: An integrated model in the U.S. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 145151.

Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: preservice teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and classroom practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 113-121.

Tuzel, A. E. B., & Akcan, S. (2009). Raising the language awareness of pre-service English teachers in an EFL context. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 271-287.

Vaughn, S. Boss, C., & Schumm, J. (1997). Teaching mainstreammed, diverse, and at-risk students in the general education. Boston: Allyn &

Bacon.

Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54 (2), 143-178.

YOK [The Council of Higher Education]. (2007). Ogretmen yetistirme el kitabı. [Manual for teacher training]. Ankara: YOK.

Yunus, M.M., Hashim, H. Ishak, N.M., & Mahamod, Z. (2010). Understanding TESL PTs’ teaching experiences and challenges via post-practicum reflection forms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 722-728.